Presidential References to Executive Actions in Public Comments on Supreme Court Cases*

Why do presidents reference executive actions in their public commentary on Supreme Court cases? We contend that presidents are motivated by their policy and reelection goals to respond strategically through executive action on Court cases that they address publicly. Presidents who tie their executive actions to Court cases may add legitimacy to those actions, thereby bolstering their policy choices in the eyes of the public, Congress, and the Court. We examine the factors shaping presidents’ decisions to tie their executive actions to Court cases using a novel database covering the Eisenhower to Biden presidencies (1953–2024). We find that the president’s ideological proximity to the Court, agreement with the Court’s decisions, and approval ratings are especially important factors. These findings contribute the literatures on executive action, the separation of powers, and the public presidency providing new insight into how presidents leverage Court decisions to justify executive actions to achieve their goals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Political Research Quarterly
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10659129261427679
Primary Topic
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Presidential References to Executive Actions in Public Comments on Supreme Court Cases*

Matthew Eshbaugh-Soha
Political Research Quarterly
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
article

Presidential References to Executive Actions in Public Comments on Supreme Court Cases*

Matthew Eshbaugh-Soha
article en

Abstract

Why do presidents reference executive actions in their public commentary on Supreme Court cases? We contend that presidents are motivated by their policy and reelection goals to respond strategically through executive action on Court cases that they address publicly. Presidents who tie their executive actions to Court cases may add legitimacy to those actions, thereby bolstering their policy choices in the eyes of the public, Congress, and the Court. We examine the factors shaping presidents’ decisions to tie their executive actions to Court cases using a novel database covering the Eisenhower to Biden presidencies (1953–2024). We find that the president’s ideological proximity to the Court, agreement with the Court’s decisions, and approval ratings are especially important factors. These findings contribute the literatures on executive action, the separation of powers, and the public presidency providing new insight into how presidents leverage Court decisions to justify executive actions to achieve their goals.

Political Research Quarterly
University of North Texas (US), University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Presidential References to Executive Actions in Public Comments on Supreme Court Cases* — Matthew Eshbaugh-Soha · Political Research Quarterly (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS