A Retrospective Quality Audit of a Prostate Cancer Biobank Reveals Procurement Method as the Critical Determinant of Biospecimen Fitness-for-Purpose

The "fitness-for-purpose" of biospecimens is paramount for reproducible genomic and proteomic research, yet is frequently compromised by preanalytical variability. To identify key determinants of sample quality in prostate cancer (PCa), a disease characterized by challenging tissue procurement, we conducted a retrospective quality audit of 300 radical prostatectomy specimens. Biospecimens were stratified based on Tumor Nuclei Percentage (TNP) against established thresholds for proteomic (TNP ≥ 20%) and genomic (TNP ≥ 50%) applications, revealing significant heterogeneity in the cohort's overall quality. Subsequent analysis of preanalytical data revealed that the tissue procurement method-conventional macroscopic inspection, preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guidance, or biopsy-guidance-was the single most significant factor associated with achieving high-quality strata. For the stringent genomics-grade threshold (TNP ≥ 50%), guided procurement methods (MRI: 60.00%; Biopsy: 56.00%) more than doubled the yield of qualifying samples compared with conventional inspection (28.00%; <i>p</i> < 0.0001). This work establishes guided procurement not merely as a superior technique, but as an essential quality assurance standard for modern PCa biobanking, ensuring the collection of biospecimens that are truly "fit-for-purpose" in the era of precision medicine.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biopreservation and Biobanking
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/19475535261417938
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Retrospective Quality Audit of a Prostate Cancer Biobank Reveals Procurement Method as the Critical Determinant of Biospecimen Fitness-for-Purpose

Beiyan Liu, Weiwei Jin, Fei Ding, Midie Xu et al.
Biopreservation and Biobanking
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

A Retrospective Quality Audit of a Prostate Cancer Biobank Reveals Procurement Method as the Critical Determinant of Biospecimen Fitness-for-Purpose

Beiyan Liu, Weiwei Jin, Fei Ding, Midie Xu, Yanzi Gu, Guangqi Qin, Qinqin Hou, Menghong Sun, Qi Wang
article en

Abstract

The "fitness-for-purpose" of biospecimens is paramount for reproducible genomic and proteomic research, yet is frequently compromised by preanalytical variability. To identify key determinants of sample quality in prostate cancer (PCa), a disease characterized by challenging tissue procurement, we conducted a retrospective quality audit of 300 radical prostatectomy specimens. Biospecimens were stratified based on Tumor Nuclei Percentage (TNP) against established thresholds for proteomic (TNP ≥ 20%) and genomic (TNP ≥ 50%) applications, revealing significant heterogeneity in the cohort's overall quality. Subsequent analysis of preanalytical data revealed that the tissue procurement method-conventional macroscopic inspection, preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guidance, or biopsy-guidance-was the single most significant factor associated with achieving high-quality strata. For the stringent genomics-grade threshold (TNP ≥ 50%), guided procurement methods (MRI: 60.00%; Biopsy: 56.00%) more than doubled the yield of qualifying samples compared with conventional inspection (28.00%; <i>p</i> < 0.0001). This work establishes guided procurement not merely as a superior technique, but as an essential quality assurance standard for modern PCa biobanking, ensuring the collection of biospecimens that are truly "fit-for-purpose" in the era of precision medicine.

Biopreservation and Biobanking
Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University (CN), Fudan University (CN), Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.