Mental health in the construction industry: vulnerabilities and psychosocial risks among diverse workers

Abstract Workers in the construction industry are at heightened risk of mental ill-health and suicide; however, a more nuanced understanding of risk factors is needed to inform prevention efforts. The current study aimed to identify workers most at risk of poor mental health and offer unique insights into both the prevalence and impact of workplace psychosocial risk factors among less commonly examined subgroups of workers. A nationwide survey was conducted with 710 workers from an Australian construction company. Differences in psychological distress (K10) were tested between demographic groups. Both the presence of psychosocial risk factors and their impact on distress were assessed and compared across various occupational roles. Women, younger, part-time/casual, and newer workers were particularly vulnerable to distress. Some of the most prevalent workplace risk factors were also among the most impactful on mental health (job role ambiguity/conflict; lack of job control). Others were less prevalent but highly impactful (bullying/harassment) or highly prevalent but less impactful (high job demands; long hours; lack of reward/recognition). Tradespeople, technical/analytical workers, office workers, and managers were equally at risk of poor mental health; however, each occupational category (and especially tradespeople) appeared disproportionately impacted by particular workplace risk factors. Prevention efforts should focus on particularly vulnerable industry subgroups and target risks with the potential to have the greatest impact. Various occupational groups appear equally in need of preventative action, although such efforts should account for the distinct risks experienced by these groups.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Psychology
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-026-09121-6
Primary Topic
Occupational Health and Safety Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mental health in the construction industry: vulnerabilities and psychosocial risks among diverse workers

Daniel Collins, Mark Deady, Samuel B. Harvey, Andrew Arena
Current Psychology
Occupational Health and Safety Research
article

Mental health in the construction industry: vulnerabilities and psychosocial risks among diverse workers

Daniel Collins, Mark Deady, Samuel B. Harvey, Andrew Arena
article en

Abstract

Abstract Workers in the construction industry are at heightened risk of mental ill-health and suicide; however, a more nuanced understanding of risk factors is needed to inform prevention efforts. The current study aimed to identify workers most at risk of poor mental health and offer unique insights into both the prevalence and impact of workplace psychosocial risk factors among less commonly examined subgroups of workers. A nationwide survey was conducted with 710 workers from an Australian construction company. Differences in psychological distress (K10) were tested between demographic groups. Both the presence of psychosocial risk factors and their impact on distress were assessed and compared across various occupational roles. Women, younger, part-time/casual, and newer workers were particularly vulnerable to distress. Some of the most prevalent workplace risk factors were also among the most impactful on mental health (job role ambiguity/conflict; lack of job control). Others were less prevalent but highly impactful (bullying/harassment) or highly prevalent but less impactful (high job demands; long hours; lack of reward/recognition). Tradespeople, technical/analytical workers, office workers, and managers were equally at risk of poor mental health; however, each occupational category (and especially tradespeople) appeared disproportionately impacted by particular workplace risk factors. Prevention efforts should focus on particularly vulnerable industry subgroups and target risks with the potential to have the greatest impact. Various occupational groups appear equally in need of preventative action, although such efforts should account for the distinct risks experienced by these groups.

Current PsychologyVol. 45(5)
Black Dog Institute (AU), UNSW Sydney (AU)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Occupational Health and Safety Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.