Abstract PS1-12-13: Real-world rate of switching and reasons for switching among CDK4/6i drugs among first-line metastatic HR+/HER2- breast cancer patients

Abstract Background: The combination of CDK4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) (abemaciclib [abema], palbociclib [palbo], or ribociclib [ribo]) and endocrine therapy (ET) is standard-of-care for patients (pts) with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (HR+/HER2- mBC). These agents demonstrate similar improvements in progression-free-survival, but only ribo has shown consistent overall survival (OS) benefit across multiple phase III trials. This clinical benefit, as well as toxicity profiles, comorbid conditions, physician familiarity, and pt-specific factors, may influence initial selection and switching patterns in clinical practice. This study characterizes switching patterns in pts initiating first-line (1L) CDK4/6i + ET. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the IntegraConnect PrecisionQ de-identified electronic health record (EHR) database, which includes data on >3 million cancer pts treated across >500 US care sites. Pts with HR+/HER2− mBC who initiated 1L treatment with abema, palbo, or ribo between 02/26/2018 and 05/16/2025 were included. Switching was defined as discontinuation of the initial CDK4/6i followed by initiation of another CDK4/6i. Data on whether the accompanying ET was changed at the time of the CDK4/6i switch were not assessed. Pts (n=179) were selected for a subset analysis based on the availability of curated discontinuation reasons (toxicity, disease progression, personal/financial), which were manually abstracted from clinical documentation. Pts were stratified by initial CDK4/6i, documented reason for switching, and time to switch (≤30, 31-90, 91-180, >180 days). Differences in time to switch by reason were assessed using Wilcoxon rank-sum testing. Results: Among 11,928 pts with HR+/HER2− mBC who initiated 1L treatment with CDK4/6i + ET, 7,499 used palbo, 2,371 used ribo, and 2,058 used abema. Of these pts, 577 pts (7.7%) switched from palbo, 307 (12.9%) from ribo, and 264 (12.8%) from abema to an alternative CDK4/6i. Toxicity was the most frequently documented reason for switching, reported in 91.8% of pts who switched from abema, 69.7% from ribo, and 49.5% from palbo. The median duration of therapy prior to switching for toxicity was longest for palbo (131 days), followed by abema (96 days) and ribo (95 days). Disease progression as a reason for switching was most commonly reported in pts initially treated with palbo (42.3%), followed by ribo (21.2%) and abema (6.1%). Pts who switched due to disease progression had a significantly longer time to switch than those who switched for other reasons (median 444 vs. 141 days; Wilcoxon P<0.0001). Switches occurred most commonly after >180 days for palbo (58.8%), whereas earlier switches (≤180 days) were more frequent for abema and ribo (∼70%). Among those who switched from palbo, 64.1% switched to abema and 35.9% to ribo. Among pts who switched from ribo, 61.2% switched to palbo and 38.8% to abema. Of those switching from abema, 75.4% switched to palbo and 24.6% to ribo. Conclusion: In this real-world analysis of 1L CDK4/6i use in HR+/HER2- mBC, intra-class switching was common and most often driven by toxicity rather than disease progression. Time to switch varied by initial agent and reason for discontinuation with palbo users more frequently switching later and for progression, while earlier switches from abema and ribo were largely due to intolerance. This study’s retrospective design may introduce selection bias, and reasons for switching were not always documented. Comorbidities, tumor burden, prior treatments, and access to care were not captured, representing potential unmeasured confounders. Additionally, evolving data availability and drug approvals during the study period may have influenced treatment choices and switching patterns. Citation Format: S. Reganti, R. Choksi, V. Gorantla, F. Kudrik, D. Patt, S. Reddy, S. Rosenfeld, D. Parris, M. Wang, A. Rui, M. Gart, C. Wall, B. Wang, P. Varughese, J. Donegan, L. Morere, R. Geller, J. Scott, R. Mahtani. Real-world rate of switching and reasons for switching among CDK4/6i drugs among first-line metastatic HR+/HER2- breast cancer patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS1-12-13.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Cancer Research
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps1-12-13
Primary Topic
Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract PS1-12-13: Real-world rate of switching and reasons for switching among CDK4/6i drugs among first-line metastatic HR+/HER2- breast cancer patients

Fred J. Kudrik, Beverly Y. Wang, Rushir J. Choksi, Debra A. Patt et al.
Clinical Cancer Research
Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
article

Abstract PS1-12-13: Real-world rate of switching and reasons for switching among CDK4/6i drugs among first-line metastatic HR+/HER2- breast cancer patients

Fred J. Kudrik, Beverly Y. Wang, Rushir J. Choksi, Debra A. Patt, Janet H. Scott, Vikram Gorantla, M. Wang, R. L. Mahtani, P. Varughese, D. Parris, A. Rui, R. Geller, S. Reganti, S. Reddy, M. Gart, J. Donegan, S. Rosenfeld, L. Morere, C. Wall
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: The combination of CDK4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) (abemaciclib [abema], palbociclib [palbo], or ribociclib [ribo]) and endocrine therapy (ET) is standard-of-care for patients (pts) with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (HR+/HER2- mBC). These agents demonstrate similar improvements in progression-free-survival, but only ribo has shown consistent overall survival (OS) benefit across multiple phase III trials. This clinical benefit, as well as toxicity profiles, comorbid conditions, physician familiarity, and pt-specific factors, may influence initial selection and switching patterns in clinical practice. This study characterizes switching patterns in pts initiating first-line (1L) CDK4/6i + ET. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the IntegraConnect PrecisionQ de-identified electronic health record (EHR) database, which includes data on >3 million cancer pts treated across >500 US care sites. Pts with HR+/HER2− mBC who initiated 1L treatment with abema, palbo, or ribo between 02/26/2018 and 05/16/2025 were included. Switching was defined as discontinuation of the initial CDK4/6i followed by initiation of another CDK4/6i. Data on whether the accompanying ET was changed at the time of the CDK4/6i switch were not assessed. Pts (n=179) were selected for a subset analysis based on the availability of curated discontinuation reasons (toxicity, disease progression, personal/financial), which were manually abstracted from clinical documentation. Pts were stratified by initial CDK4/6i, documented reason for switching, and time to switch (≤30, 31-90, 91-180, >180 days). Differences in time to switch by reason were assessed using Wilcoxon rank-sum testing. Results: Among 11,928 pts with HR+/HER2− mBC who initiated 1L treatment with CDK4/6i + ET, 7,499 used palbo, 2,371 used ribo, and 2,058 used abema. Of these pts, 577 pts (7.7%) switched from palbo, 307 (12.9%) from ribo, and 264 (12.8%) from abema to an alternative CDK4/6i. Toxicity was the most frequently documented reason for switching, reported in 91.8% of pts who switched from abema, 69.7% from ribo, and 49.5% from palbo. The median duration of therapy prior to switching for toxicity was longest for palbo (131 days), followed by abema (96 days) and ribo (95 days). Disease progression as a reason for switching was most commonly reported in pts initially treated with palbo (42.3%), followed by ribo (21.2%) and abema (6.1%). Pts who switched due to disease progression had a significantly longer time to switch than those who switched for other reasons (median 444 vs. 141 days; Wilcoxon P<0.0001). Switches occurred most commonly after >180 days for palbo (58.8%), whereas earlier switches (≤180 days) were more frequent for abema and ribo (∼70%). Among those who switched from palbo, 64.1% switched to abema and 35.9% to ribo. Among pts who switched from ribo, 61.2% switched to palbo and 38.8% to abema. Of those switching from abema, 75.4% switched to palbo and 24.6% to ribo. Conclusion: In this real-world analysis of 1L CDK4/6i use in HR+/HER2- mBC, intra-class switching was common and most often driven by toxicity rather than disease progression. Time to switch varied by initial agent and reason for discontinuation with palbo users more frequently switching later and for progression, while earlier switches from abema and ribo were largely due to intolerance. This study’s retrospective design may introduce selection bias, and reasons for switching were not always documented. Comorbidities, tumor burden, prior treatments, and access to care were not captured, representing potential unmeasured confounders. Additionally, evolving data availability and drug approvals during the study period may have influenced treatment choices and switching patterns. Citation Format: S. Reganti, R. Choksi, V. Gorantla, F. Kudrik, D. Patt, S. Reddy, S. Rosenfeld, D. Parris, M. Wang, A. Rui, M. Gart, C. Wall, B. Wang, P. Varughese, J. Donegan, L. Morere, R. Geller, J. Scott, R. Mahtani. Real-world rate of switching and reasons for switching among CDK4/6i drugs among first-line metastatic HR+/HER2- breast cancer patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS1-12-13.

Clinical Cancer ResearchVol. 32(4_Supplement)
Baptist Hospital of Miami (US), Texas Oncology (US), Baptist Health South Florida (US), South Carolina Oncology Associates (US), Highlands Oncology Group (US), West Palm Beach VA Medical Center (US), University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (US), Oncology Specialists (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.