Abstract PS2-05-27: Omission of Axillary Surgery in Early Breast Cancer with Negative Lymph Nodes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

Abstract Objective: To evaluate whether the omission of axillary surgery impacts clinical outcomes in patients with early-stage breastcancer and clinically negative lymph nodes. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing no axillarysurgery with standard axillary interventions (sentinel lymph node biopsy [SLNB] or axillary dissection [AD]). This study followed PRISMA guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420250653779). Searches were conducted in PubMed,Web of Science, and Embase through June 2025. Outcomes assessed included overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS),and axillary recurrence (AR). Meta-analyses were performed using RevMan 5.4. Risk of bias was assessed using the RoB 2 tool. Results: Out of 853 records, seven RCTs including 8,806 patients met the inclusion criteria. Among them, 2,915 patients underwent no axillary surgery, while 5,891 received surgical axillary treatment. Two trials compared no surgery with SLNB, and five compared no surgery with AD. No significant differences were found in OS (OR = 1.02; 95% CI, 0.86-1.20; p = 0.84; I2 =36%) or DFS (OR = 0.80; 95% CI, 0.63-1.00; p = 0.05; I2 = 63%). AR was significantly lower in the axillary surgery group (OR= 0.18; 95% CI, 0.10-0.31; p < 0.01; I2 = 39%). Conclusion: The omission of axillary surgery in early-stage breast cancer with clinically negative lymph nodes does not negatively impact overall or disease-free survival. However, it is associated with a higher—though still low—risk of axillary recurrence. Citation Format: B. B. Castelo, L. O. Brito, R. Z. Torresan, C. Cardoso Filho, G. M. Duarte. Omission of Axillary Surgery in Early Breast Cancer with Negative Lymph Nodes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS2-05-27.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Cancer Research
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps2-05-27
Primary Topic
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract PS2-05-27: Omission of Axillary Surgery in Early Breast Cancer with Negative Lymph Nodes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

B. B. Castelo, L. O. Brito, G. M. Duarte, R. Zocchio Torresan et al.
Clinical Cancer Research
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
article

Abstract PS2-05-27: Omission of Axillary Surgery in Early Breast Cancer with Negative Lymph Nodes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

B. B. Castelo, L. O. Brito, G. M. Duarte, R. Zocchio Torresan, C. Cardoso Filho
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objective: To evaluate whether the omission of axillary surgery impacts clinical outcomes in patients with early-stage breastcancer and clinically negative lymph nodes. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing no axillarysurgery with standard axillary interventions (sentinel lymph node biopsy [SLNB] or axillary dissection [AD]). This study followed PRISMA guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420250653779). Searches were conducted in PubMed,Web of Science, and Embase through June 2025. Outcomes assessed included overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS),and axillary recurrence (AR). Meta-analyses were performed using RevMan 5.4. Risk of bias was assessed using the RoB 2 tool. Results: Out of 853 records, seven RCTs including 8,806 patients met the inclusion criteria. Among them, 2,915 patients underwent no axillary surgery, while 5,891 received surgical axillary treatment. Two trials compared no surgery with SLNB, and five compared no surgery with AD. No significant differences were found in OS (OR = 1.02; 95% CI, 0.86-1.20; p = 0.84; I2 =36%) or DFS (OR = 0.80; 95% CI, 0.63-1.00; p = 0.05; I2 = 63%). AR was significantly lower in the axillary surgery group (OR= 0.18; 95% CI, 0.10-0.31; p < 0.01; I2 = 39%). Conclusion: The omission of axillary surgery in early-stage breast cancer with clinically negative lymph nodes does not negatively impact overall or disease-free survival. However, it is associated with a higher—though still low—risk of axillary recurrence. Citation Format: B. B. Castelo, L. O. Brito, R. Z. Torresan, C. Cardoso Filho, G. M. Duarte. Omission of Axillary Surgery in Early Breast Cancer with Negative Lymph Nodes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS2-05-27.

Clinical Cancer ResearchVol. 32(4_Supplement)
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.