Abstract PS4-07-24: Phase 3 study of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy followed by adjuvant pembrolizumab for early-stage TNBC: KEYNOTE-522 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) subgroup analysis

Abstract Background: In the KEYNOTE-522 study (NCT03036488), neoadjuvant pembrolizumab (pembro) plus chemotherapy (chemo) followed by adjuvant pembro plus chemo significantly improved pathological complete response (pCR), event-free survival, and OS compared with placebo (pbo) plus chemo in participants (pts) with early-stage TNBC. Following neoadjuvant therapy, the estimated treatment difference in pCR for pembro plus chemo vs pbo plus chemo was 13.6% (95% CI, 5.4%‒21.8%; P < 0.001) at the first interim analysis (N=602). Although pCR provides a definitive indicator of neoadjuvant treatment success, other measures, such as RECIST v1.1 and functional tumor volume (FTV), may offer an earlier signal of therapeutic activity. This prespecified exploratory analysis evaluated associations of pCR with ORR at different time points per MRI by RECIST v1.1 and FTV by blinded independent central review. Methods: Pts with previously untreated TNBC (stage T1c N1-N2 or T2-T4 N0-N2) were randomized 2:1 to neoadjuvant pembro 200 mg Q3W or pbo, each with 4 cycles of paclitaxel plus carboplatin (treatment 1) then with 4 cycles of doxorubicin or epirubicin plus cyclophosphamide (treatment 2). After definitive surgery, pts received adjuvant pembro or pbo for 9 cycles or until recurrence/unacceptable toxicity. Breast MRI was performed for consenting pts at screening and after neoadjuvant treatments 1 and 2. Responders were defined as pts who achieved CR or PR per RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central radiology review. The subgroup analyses population included the randomized pts who signed MRI consent and had baseline values by central radiology review. Results: At data cutoff (March 23, 2021), MRI subgroup analyses included 162 pts (pembro plus chemo, n = 97; pbo plus chemo, n = 65). After treatment 1, ORR per RECIST v1.1 was 91.8% for pembro plus chemo vs 84.6% for pbo plus chemo, while ORR per MRI FTV was 96.9% vs 93.8%. After treatment 2, ORR per RECIST v1.1 was 82.5% vs 90.8%, and ORR per MRI FTV was 84.5% vs 92.3% for pembro plus chemo and pbo plus chemo, respectively. In the post hoc exploratory analyses for pCR in the MRI subgroup, pCR rate (ypT0/Tis ypN0; 95% CI) was 62.9% (52.5%-72.5%) with pembro plus chemo vs 52.3% (39.5%-64.9%) with pbo plus chemo. Odds ratios (OR) for achieving pCR among pts with ORR per RECIST v1.1 or FTV across all patients (pembro plus chemo and pbo plus chemo combined) are shown in the Table. Conclusions: Across all pts (ie, for pembro plus chemo and pbo plus chemo combined), the odds of achieving pCR were higher among pts who had an objective response per either RECIST v1.1 or FTV. Citation Format: J. Cortés, R. Dent, H. McArthur, L. Pusztai, S. Kümmel, C. Denkert, J. O’Shaughnessy, P. A. Fasching, M. Untch, R. Tarnawaski, M. Mouret-Reynier, S. M. Stemmer, T. Foukakis, J. Boileau, C. Chung, M. Fernandez, J. A. Mejia, F. Beca, S. Hou, P. Schmid. Phase 3 study of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy followed by adjuvant pembrolizumab for early-stage TNBC: KEYNOTE-522 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) subgroup analysis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS4-07-24.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Cancer Research
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps4-07-24
Primary Topic
Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract PS4-07-24: Phase 3 study of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy followed by adjuvant pembrolizumab for early-stage TNBC: KEYNOTE-522 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) subgroup analysis

Siyuan Hou, Carsten Denkert, Rebecca Dent, S Kümmel et al.
Clinical Cancer Research
Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics
article

Abstract PS4-07-24: Phase 3 study of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy followed by adjuvant pembrolizumab for early-stage TNBC: KEYNOTE-522 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) subgroup analysis

Siyuan Hou, Carsten Denkert, Rebecca Dent, S Kümmel, Francisco Beca, Michael Untch, T. Foukakis, J. Boileau, R. Tarnawaski, P. A. Fasching, H. McArthur, J. A. Mejia, S. M. Stemmer, M. Fernandez, C. Chung, J. Cortés, P. Schmid, L. Pusztai, J. O’Shaughnessy
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: In the KEYNOTE-522 study (NCT03036488), neoadjuvant pembrolizumab (pembro) plus chemotherapy (chemo) followed by adjuvant pembro plus chemo significantly improved pathological complete response (pCR), event-free survival, and OS compared with placebo (pbo) plus chemo in participants (pts) with early-stage TNBC. Following neoadjuvant therapy, the estimated treatment difference in pCR for pembro plus chemo vs pbo plus chemo was 13.6% (95% CI, 5.4%‒21.8%; P < 0.001) at the first interim analysis (N=602). Although pCR provides a definitive indicator of neoadjuvant treatment success, other measures, such as RECIST v1.1 and functional tumor volume (FTV), may offer an earlier signal of therapeutic activity. This prespecified exploratory analysis evaluated associations of pCR with ORR at different time points per MRI by RECIST v1.1 and FTV by blinded independent central review. Methods: Pts with previously untreated TNBC (stage T1c N1-N2 or T2-T4 N0-N2) were randomized 2:1 to neoadjuvant pembro 200 mg Q3W or pbo, each with 4 cycles of paclitaxel plus carboplatin (treatment 1) then with 4 cycles of doxorubicin or epirubicin plus cyclophosphamide (treatment 2). After definitive surgery, pts received adjuvant pembro or pbo for 9 cycles or until recurrence/unacceptable toxicity. Breast MRI was performed for consenting pts at screening and after neoadjuvant treatments 1 and 2. Responders were defined as pts who achieved CR or PR per RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central radiology review. The subgroup analyses population included the randomized pts who signed MRI consent and had baseline values by central radiology review. Results: At data cutoff (March 23, 2021), MRI subgroup analyses included 162 pts (pembro plus chemo, n = 97; pbo plus chemo, n = 65). After treatment 1, ORR per RECIST v1.1 was 91.8% for pembro plus chemo vs 84.6% for pbo plus chemo, while ORR per MRI FTV was 96.9% vs 93.8%. After treatment 2, ORR per RECIST v1.1 was 82.5% vs 90.8%, and ORR per MRI FTV was 84.5% vs 92.3% for pembro plus chemo and pbo plus chemo, respectively. In the post hoc exploratory analyses for pCR in the MRI subgroup, pCR rate (ypT0/Tis ypN0; 95% CI) was 62.9% (52.5%-72.5%) with pembro plus chemo vs 52.3% (39.5%-64.9%) with pbo plus chemo. Odds ratios (OR) for achieving pCR among pts with ORR per RECIST v1.1 or FTV across all patients (pembro plus chemo and pbo plus chemo combined) are shown in the Table. Conclusions: Across all pts (ie, for pembro plus chemo and pbo plus chemo combined), the odds of achieving pCR were higher among pts who had an objective response per either RECIST v1.1 or FTV. Citation Format: J. Cortés, R. Dent, H. McArthur, L. Pusztai, S. Kümmel, C. Denkert, J. O’Shaughnessy, P. A. Fasching, M. Untch, R. Tarnawaski, M. Mouret-Reynier, S. M. Stemmer, T. Foukakis, J. Boileau, C. Chung, M. Fernandez, J. A. Mejia, F. Beca, S. Hou, P. Schmid. Phase 3 study of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy followed by adjuvant pembrolizumab for early-stage TNBC: KEYNOTE-522 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) subgroup analysis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS4-07-24.

Clinical Cancer ResearchVol. 32(4_Supplement)
Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) (US), OncoMed (United States) (US), Karolinska University Hospital (SE), Philipps University of Marburg (DE), Queen Mary University of London (GB), Rabin Medical Center (IL), Jewish General Hospital (CA), Baylor University Medical Center (US), Yale Cancer Center (US), Hospital Universitario Quirónsalud Madrid (ES), National Institute of Oncology (HU), Breast Center (CH), Centre Jean Perrin (FR), Koo Foundation Sun Yat-Sen Cancer Center (TW), National Cancer Centre Singapore (SG), Kliniken Essen-Mitte (DE), Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen (DE), Helios Hospital Berlin-Buch (DE), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.