Tools for municipal health promotion planning—A Group Delphi study to facilitate decision-making

Health promotion at the local level requires coordinated action for the development of strategies to promote health and well-being. For structuring and implementing such processes, planning tools can help local coordinators. However, before starting the planning process, coordinators must navigate a broad range of available tools and identify those that best fit their local needs and conditions. Despite the availability of various planning tools for municipal health promotion, there is limited research on what kind of information can help health professionals choose the most suitable tool. To address this gap, the study investigates which specific attributes of planning tools are considered most relevant by municipal health promotion practitioners for informed decision-making. The study was conducted using the Group Delphi method, which involved experts in a participatory process to reach consensus on pre-defined statements. A total of 17 experts from intersectoral fields including municipalities, federal state and national institutions as well as academia took part. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of the Delphi results led to the identification of eleven categories. These findings provide a practical framework for describing planning tools in a way that meets the information needs of practitioners. By improving clarity and accessibility of tool descriptions, the results can support more targeted tool selection, enhance the efficiency of planning processes and ultimately contribute to a more effective municipal health promotion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Promotion International
Published
2026-01-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daag024
Primary Topic
Public Health Policies and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tools for municipal health promotion planning—A Group Delphi study to facilitate decision-making

Patricia Tollmann, Michelle Baus, Ines Schönfeld, Tim Rossenbach et al.
Health Promotion International
Public Health Policies and Education
article

Tools for municipal health promotion planning—A Group Delphi study to facilitate decision-making

Patricia Tollmann, Michelle Baus, Ines Schönfeld, Tim Rossenbach, Eike Quilling, Pia Rangnow
article en

Abstract

Health promotion at the local level requires coordinated action for the development of strategies to promote health and well-being. For structuring and implementing such processes, planning tools can help local coordinators. However, before starting the planning process, coordinators must navigate a broad range of available tools and identify those that best fit their local needs and conditions. Despite the availability of various planning tools for municipal health promotion, there is limited research on what kind of information can help health professionals choose the most suitable tool. To address this gap, the study investigates which specific attributes of planning tools are considered most relevant by municipal health promotion practitioners for informed decision-making. The study was conducted using the Group Delphi method, which involved experts in a participatory process to reach consensus on pre-defined statements. A total of 17 experts from intersectoral fields including municipalities, federal state and national institutions as well as academia took part. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of the Delphi results led to the identification of eleven categories. These findings provide a practical framework for describing planning tools in a way that meets the information needs of practitioners. By improving clarity and accessibility of tool descriptions, the results can support more targeted tool selection, enhance the efficiency of planning processes and ultimately contribute to a more effective municipal health promotion.

Health Promotion InternationalVol. 41(1)
Hochschule für Gesundheit - University of Applied Sciences (DE)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Public Health Policies and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Tools for municipal health promotion planning—A Group Delphi study to facilitate decision-making — Patricia Tollmann, Michelle Baus, et al. · Health Promotion International (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS