PS4-05-18: The predictive value of tumor-to-gland density ratio in pathological complete response to Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer

Abstract Objective: Identifying effective predictors of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is essential for personalized breast cancer treatment. Our previous observations suggested that a higher tumor-to-gland density ratio (TGDR) on mammography may predict poorer therapeutic response. This study evaluated the predictive value of TGDR in NAC and developed models based on various pathological complete response (pCR) criteria. Methods: This retrospective study included 303 breast cancer patients who received NAC at the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University from January 2020 to July 2024. pCR was defined by four criteria: pCR1 (ypT0/is), pCR2 (ypT0/is ypN0), pCR3 (ypT0), and pCR4 (ypT0 ypN0). Patients were randomly divided into training and test sets (7:3). Logistic regression analyses identified independent predictors for each pCR criterion, and multiple logistic regression (LR) models were constructed. Model performance was assessed using AUC, F1 score, DeLong test, DCA, NRI, and IDI. Four machine learning algorithms (SVM, K-nearest neighbor, XGBoost, and LightGBM) were applied to compare predictive performance. Results: For pCR1, 140 patients (46.2%) achieved response. TGDR, ADC, ER, HER2, histological grade, and molecular subtype were independent predictors. Combined-variable models (AUCs: 0.840-0.852) outperformed single-variable models and demonstrated good clinical utility. Model 3 was selected for its simplicity and MRI independence; the LR algorithm performed best. For pCR2 (n=127), similar predictors were identified. Combined models (AUCs: 0.847-0.859) showed strong performance; SVM performed best. For pCR3 (n=118), model 2 (TGDR + pathological features) outperformed TGDR alone (AUC: 0.848 vs. 0.705); XGBoost performed best. For pCR4 (n=109), model 2 (TGDR, ER, HER2) outperformed model 1 (TGDR alone) in both training and test sets; the LR model performed best. Conclusion: TGDR is a novel imaging biomarker with predictive performance comparable to ADC and is an independent predictor of NAC response. Across all pCR criteria, TGDR-based models combined with clinicopathological features consistently outperformed TGDR alone. TGDR offers a practical alternative for NAC response prediction, particularly in settings with limited MRI access. Citation Format: W. Shijing, W. Hongrui, X. Mao. The predictive value of tumor-to-gland density ratio in pathological complete response to Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS4-05-18.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Cancer Research
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps4-05-18
Primary Topic
Cancer Risks and Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PS4-05-18: The predictive value of tumor-to-gland density ratio in pathological complete response to Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer

W. Shijing, W. Hongrui, X. Mao
Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Risks and Factors
article

PS4-05-18: The predictive value of tumor-to-gland density ratio in pathological complete response to Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer

W. Shijing, W. Hongrui, X. Mao
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objective: Identifying effective predictors of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is essential for personalized breast cancer treatment. Our previous observations suggested that a higher tumor-to-gland density ratio (TGDR) on mammography may predict poorer therapeutic response. This study evaluated the predictive value of TGDR in NAC and developed models based on various pathological complete response (pCR) criteria. Methods: This retrospective study included 303 breast cancer patients who received NAC at the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University from January 2020 to July 2024. pCR was defined by four criteria: pCR1 (ypT0/is), pCR2 (ypT0/is ypN0), pCR3 (ypT0), and pCR4 (ypT0 ypN0). Patients were randomly divided into training and test sets (7:3). Logistic regression analyses identified independent predictors for each pCR criterion, and multiple logistic regression (LR) models were constructed. Model performance was assessed using AUC, F1 score, DeLong test, DCA, NRI, and IDI. Four machine learning algorithms (SVM, K-nearest neighbor, XGBoost, and LightGBM) were applied to compare predictive performance. Results: For pCR1, 140 patients (46.2%) achieved response. TGDR, ADC, ER, HER2, histological grade, and molecular subtype were independent predictors. Combined-variable models (AUCs: 0.840-0.852) outperformed single-variable models and demonstrated good clinical utility. Model 3 was selected for its simplicity and MRI independence; the LR algorithm performed best. For pCR2 (n=127), similar predictors were identified. Combined models (AUCs: 0.847-0.859) showed strong performance; SVM performed best. For pCR3 (n=118), model 2 (TGDR + pathological features) outperformed TGDR alone (AUC: 0.848 vs. 0.705); XGBoost performed best. For pCR4 (n=109), model 2 (TGDR, ER, HER2) outperformed model 1 (TGDR alone) in both training and test sets; the LR model performed best. Conclusion: TGDR is a novel imaging biomarker with predictive performance comparable to ADC and is an independent predictor of NAC response. Across all pCR criteria, TGDR-based models combined with clinicopathological features consistently outperformed TGDR alone. TGDR offers a practical alternative for NAC response prediction, particularly in settings with limited MRI access. Citation Format: W. Shijing, W. Hongrui, X. Mao. The predictive value of tumor-to-gland density ratio in pathological complete response to Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS4-05-18.

Clinical Cancer ResearchVol. 32(4_Supplement)
First Hospital of China Medical University (CN), China Medical University (CN)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Cancer Risks and Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.