Comparative Efficacy of Simvastatin-impregnated Gel Foam and Platelet-rich Fibrin (PRF) for Alveolar Ridge Preservation Following Mandibular Molar Extraction: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Introduction This study aimed to compare the regenerative potential and soft tissue healing outcomes of Simvastatin-impregnated gel foam and Platelet-Rich Fibrin (PRF) following mandibular molar extraction. Methods Forty patients undergoing mandibular molar extraction were randomly allocated into two groups: Simvastatin-impregnated gel foam (Group A) and PRF (Group B). Outcomes assessed included postoperative pain (Visual Analog Scale, VAS), soft tissue healing (Landry’s scale), bone regeneration (Cone Beam Computed Tomography, CBCT), and postoperative complications. Statistical analyses included t-tests and Chi-square tests. Results Demographic characteristics were comparable between groups. The mean extraction times were similar ( p =0.67). Postoperative pain scores decreased over time without significant differences between groups ( p >0.05). Soft tissue healing scores showed no significant differences across time points ( p >0.05). However, bone density at three months postoperatively was significantly greater in the Simvastatin group (422±30 HU) than in the PRF group (411±28 HU) ( p =0.01). Minimal postoperative complications occurred, with slightly fewer in the Simvastatin group. Discussion Simvastatin-impregnated gel foam showed superior bone regeneration compared to PRF in alveolar ridge preservation after mandibular molar extraction. Both materials effectively reduced postoperative pain and improved soft tissue healing. Simvastatin’s enhanced osteogenic, anti-inflammatory, and antimicrobial effects indicate it as a promising, minimally invasive option for superior bone healing and socket preservation. Conclusion Both Simvastatin-impregnated gel foam and PRF effectively promoted alveolar ridge preservation, though Simvastatin demonstrated superior bone regenerative capabilities. Clinical Trial Number REF/2024/10/074804

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Open Dentistry Journal
Published
2025-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2174/0118742106417477251119055847
Primary Topic
Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Efficacy of Simvastatin-impregnated Gel Foam and Platelet-rich Fibrin (PRF) for Alveolar Ridge Preservation Following Mandibular Molar Extraction: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Deepankar Shukla, S. Kanabar, Nitin Bhola
The Open Dentistry Journal
Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
article

Comparative Efficacy of Simvastatin-impregnated Gel Foam and Platelet-rich Fibrin (PRF) for Alveolar Ridge Preservation Following Mandibular Molar Extraction: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Deepankar Shukla, S. Kanabar, Nitin Bhola
article en

Abstract

Introduction This study aimed to compare the regenerative potential and soft tissue healing outcomes of Simvastatin-impregnated gel foam and Platelet-Rich Fibrin (PRF) following mandibular molar extraction. Methods Forty patients undergoing mandibular molar extraction were randomly allocated into two groups: Simvastatin-impregnated gel foam (Group A) and PRF (Group B). Outcomes assessed included postoperative pain (Visual Analog Scale, VAS), soft tissue healing (Landry’s scale), bone regeneration (Cone Beam Computed Tomography, CBCT), and postoperative complications. Statistical analyses included t-tests and Chi-square tests. Results Demographic characteristics were comparable between groups. The mean extraction times were similar ( p =0.67). Postoperative pain scores decreased over time without significant differences between groups ( p >0.05). Soft tissue healing scores showed no significant differences across time points ( p >0.05). However, bone density at three months postoperatively was significantly greater in the Simvastatin group (422±30 HU) than in the PRF group (411±28 HU) ( p =0.01). Minimal postoperative complications occurred, with slightly fewer in the Simvastatin group. Discussion Simvastatin-impregnated gel foam showed superior bone regeneration compared to PRF in alveolar ridge preservation after mandibular molar extraction. Both materials effectively reduced postoperative pain and improved soft tissue healing. Simvastatin’s enhanced osteogenic, anti-inflammatory, and antimicrobial effects indicate it as a promising, minimally invasive option for superior bone healing and socket preservation. Conclusion Both Simvastatin-impregnated gel foam and PRF effectively promoted alveolar ridge preservation, though Simvastatin demonstrated superior bone regenerative capabilities. Clinical Trial Number REF/2024/10/074804

The Open Dentistry JournalVol. 20(1)
Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.