Learning by Comparing: Effects of Cues Focusing on Chinese-Speaking Learners’ Acquisition of English Articles

Abstract This study examines whether and how cues focusing enhances Chinese-speaking English learners’ engagement in comparison, thereby facilitating their acquisition of English articles within xu -based comparative continuation writing tasks. Fifty English majors from a Chinese university were randomly assigned to three groups and each group was required to complete a comparative continuation task with one of three conditions: paired cues (cues presented in pairs), randomized cues (cues presented in random order), or implicit cues (no explicit cues provided). All participants undertook pretests, posttests, and delayed tests on English article knowledge, and ten of them volunteered to take follow-up interviews. The results indicate that: 1) paired cues were more effective than randomized or implicit cues in promoting the acquisition of English articles; and 2) learners in the paired cues condition produced more target-like article usage in their continuation writings compared to those in the other two conditions. The effectiveness of paired cues is attributed to an enhanced contrast effect, which prompts learners to identify similarities and differences between cues within each pair, relates cue explanations and examples with actual article usage in the reading text, and reflects upon and compares their own article productions against those in the provided reading text. The study concludes that the process of learning through continuation is fundamentally supported by learners’ capacity for comparison, reinforcing its role as a core element of xu -competence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/cjal-2026-0103
Primary Topic
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Learning by Comparing: Effects of Cues Focusing on Chinese-Speaking Learners’ Acquisition of English Articles

Mei Yang, Xiaomeng Yan, Qiying Guo
Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
article

Learning by Comparing: Effects of Cues Focusing on Chinese-Speaking Learners’ Acquisition of English Articles

Mei Yang, Xiaomeng Yan, Qiying Guo
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study examines whether and how cues focusing enhances Chinese-speaking English learners’ engagement in comparison, thereby facilitating their acquisition of English articles within xu -based comparative continuation writing tasks. Fifty English majors from a Chinese university were randomly assigned to three groups and each group was required to complete a comparative continuation task with one of three conditions: paired cues (cues presented in pairs), randomized cues (cues presented in random order), or implicit cues (no explicit cues provided). All participants undertook pretests, posttests, and delayed tests on English article knowledge, and ten of them volunteered to take follow-up interviews. The results indicate that: 1) paired cues were more effective than randomized or implicit cues in promoting the acquisition of English articles; and 2) learners in the paired cues condition produced more target-like article usage in their continuation writings compared to those in the other two conditions. The effectiveness of paired cues is attributed to an enhanced contrast effect, which prompts learners to identify similarities and differences between cues within each pair, relates cue explanations and examples with actual article usage in the reading text, and reflects upon and compares their own article productions against those in the provided reading text. The study concludes that the process of learning through continuation is fundamentally supported by learners’ capacity for comparison, reinforcing its role as a core element of xu -competence.

Chinese Journal of Applied LinguisticsVol. 49(1)
South China University of Technology (CN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.