A Unified Model of Investor Utility and Asset Pricing

This article develops a new and intuitive expression of investor utility. It starts with an empirical test of a general valuation model applied to three popular publicly traded market composites. The experiment compares the price estimates of the model to a traditional model that reflects mean-variance efficiency. Thereafter, we formally justify the usage of the proposed model. Its derivation is based on maximizing the logarithm of investor wealth. In contrast to prior work with a similar premise, we explicitly incorporate the investor time horizon, discretionary consumption, and potential investor default to determine loss aversion. We treat both borrowing and future expenditure as leverage. The resulting utility objective is finally directly transformed into a valuation model. The model is not limited to a specific probability distribution of asset returns. Although it conforms to markets where no-arbitrage conditions exist, it does not require such conditions. This makes it suitable for the valuation of illiquid assets, like private equity and private credit.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Investing
Published
2026-02-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3905/joi.2026.1.384
Primary Topic
Financial Reporting and Valuation Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Unified Model of Investor Utility and Asset Pricing

Dan diBartolomeo, Emilian Belev
The Journal of Investing
Financial Reporting and Valuation Research
article

A Unified Model of Investor Utility and Asset Pricing

Dan diBartolomeo, Emilian Belev
article en

Abstract

This article develops a new and intuitive expression of investor utility. It starts with an empirical test of a general valuation model applied to three popular publicly traded market composites. The experiment compares the price estimates of the model to a traditional model that reflects mean-variance efficiency. Thereafter, we formally justify the usage of the proposed model. Its derivation is based on maximizing the logarithm of investor wealth. In contrast to prior work with a similar premise, we explicitly incorporate the investor time horizon, discretionary consumption, and potential investor default to determine loss aversion. We treat both borrowing and future expenditure as leverage. The resulting utility objective is finally directly transformed into a valuation model. The model is not limited to a specific probability distribution of asset returns. Although it conforms to markets where no-arbitrage conditions exist, it does not require such conditions. This makes it suitable for the valuation of illiquid assets, like private equity and private credit.

The Journal of Investing
Dana (United States) (US), Clearwater Christian College (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Financial Reporting and Valuation Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.