Abstract PS3-10-01: Impact of ER Reduction Rate on Survival Outcomes in ER-Positive/HER2-Negative Breast Cancer Post-Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

Abstract Background: The conversion of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive to ER-negative status after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is often considered a poor prognostic indicator in ER-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer (BC). However, the prognostic impact of the extent of ER reduction remains unclear. Methods: This study included ER-positive/HER2-negative BC patients without pathological complete response after NAC. Cox regression assessed the relationship between ER reduction rate (ERr) and invasive disease-free survival (iDFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS), and overall survival (OS). Time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) and concordance index compared model discrimination. Results: A total of 519 patients were followed up for a median of 81 months. Participants were categorized into two groups based on the restricted cubic spline analysis, using a cut-off value of 10%. A total of 415 patients (79.96%) had ERr < 10%, while 104 patients (20.04%) had ERr ≥ 10%. In the multivariate Cox regression model, participants with ERr ≥ 10% had a significantly higher risk of iDFS (hazard ratio [HR], 2.405; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.703–3.395), DDFS (HR, 2.278; 95% CI, 1.575–3.294), and OS (HR, 2.224; 95% CI, 1.450–3.411) compared to those with ERr < 10%. Multiple sensitivity analyses yielded consistent results. Based on time-dependent ROC, adding the ERr to the prognostic model significantly improved predictions of iDFS (p = 0.025) and DDFS (p = 0.044). Conclusions: ERr ≥ 10% is associated with poorer outcomes in ER-positive/HER2-negative BC patients treated with NAC, highlighting the need for novel therapeutic strategies for this population. Citation Format: S. Liu, Y. Qiu, Y. Wang, W. Cai, H. Peng, Q. Cai, L. Wu, J. Li, L. Yu, M. Chen, L. Chen, C. Wang, F. Fu. Impact of ER Reduction Rate on Survival Outcomes in ER-Positive/HER2-Negative Breast Cancer Post-Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS3-10-01.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Cancer Research
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps3-10-01
Primary Topic
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract PS3-10-01: Impact of ER Reduction Rate on Survival Outcomes in ER-Positive/HER2-Negative Breast Cancer Post-Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

Yibin Qiu, J. Li, M. Chen, Q. Cai et al.
Clinical Cancer Research
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
article

Abstract PS3-10-01: Impact of ER Reduction Rate on Survival Outcomes in ER-Positive/HER2-Negative Breast Cancer Post-Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

Yibin Qiu, J. Li, M. Chen, Q. Cai, L. Chen, Y. Wang, C. Wang, H. Peng, W. Cai, L. Wu, L. Yu, S. Liu, F. Fu
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: The conversion of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive to ER-negative status after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is often considered a poor prognostic indicator in ER-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer (BC). However, the prognostic impact of the extent of ER reduction remains unclear. Methods: This study included ER-positive/HER2-negative BC patients without pathological complete response after NAC. Cox regression assessed the relationship between ER reduction rate (ERr) and invasive disease-free survival (iDFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS), and overall survival (OS). Time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) and concordance index compared model discrimination. Results: A total of 519 patients were followed up for a median of 81 months. Participants were categorized into two groups based on the restricted cubic spline analysis, using a cut-off value of 10%. A total of 415 patients (79.96%) had ERr < 10%, while 104 patients (20.04%) had ERr ≥ 10%. In the multivariate Cox regression model, participants with ERr ≥ 10% had a significantly higher risk of iDFS (hazard ratio [HR], 2.405; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.703–3.395), DDFS (HR, 2.278; 95% CI, 1.575–3.294), and OS (HR, 2.224; 95% CI, 1.450–3.411) compared to those with ERr < 10%. Multiple sensitivity analyses yielded consistent results. Based on time-dependent ROC, adding the ERr to the prognostic model significantly improved predictions of iDFS (p = 0.025) and DDFS (p = 0.044). Conclusions: ERr ≥ 10% is associated with poorer outcomes in ER-positive/HER2-negative BC patients treated with NAC, highlighting the need for novel therapeutic strategies for this population. Citation Format: S. Liu, Y. Qiu, Y. Wang, W. Cai, H. Peng, Q. Cai, L. Wu, J. Li, L. Yu, M. Chen, L. Chen, C. Wang, F. Fu. Impact of ER Reduction Rate on Survival Outcomes in ER-Positive/HER2-Negative Breast Cancer Post-Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS3-10-01.

Clinical Cancer ResearchVol. 32(4_Supplement)
Zhongshan Hospital of Xiamen University (CN), Union Hospital (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.