“Little Richard: Down, Not Out”: The Quasar of Rock’s LGBTQ Iconicity and the Historical Reception to His Sexuality and Gender Presentation, 1955–Present

Abstract: This article explores how musician Little Richard’s image and persona were perceived historically and the extent to which historical observers associated his effeminacy with same-sex desire. Also scrutinized is Little Richard’s present-day status as a so-called LGBTQ icon and whether LGBTQ observers in the past felt a similar kinship with the musician. I illuminate the protean and utilitarian essence of LGBTQ iconicity and argue that, in the 1950s, the link between effeminacy in men and same-sex desire was not ubiquitously acknowledged and understood. I also assert that 1950s popular culture was more accommodating of different types of men, including unconventional men, than is typically acknowledged in retrospective assessments of the period.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the History of Sexuality
Published
2025-08-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/sex.00051
Primary Topic
Music History and Culture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Little Richard: Down, Not Out”: The Quasar of Rock’s LGBTQ Iconicity and the Historical Reception to His Sexuality and Gender Presentation, 1955–Present

Jacob Bloomfield
Journal of the History of Sexuality
Music History and Culture
article

“Little Richard: Down, Not Out”: The Quasar of Rock’s LGBTQ Iconicity and the Historical Reception to His Sexuality and Gender Presentation, 1955–Present

Jacob Bloomfield
article en

Abstract

Abstract: This article explores how musician Little Richard’s image and persona were perceived historically and the extent to which historical observers associated his effeminacy with same-sex desire. Also scrutinized is Little Richard’s present-day status as a so-called LGBTQ icon and whether LGBTQ observers in the past felt a similar kinship with the musician. I illuminate the protean and utilitarian essence of LGBTQ iconicity and argue that, in the 1950s, the link between effeminacy in men and same-sex desire was not ubiquitously acknowledged and understood. I also assert that 1950s popular culture was more accommodating of different types of men, including unconventional men, than is typically acknowledged in retrospective assessments of the period.

Journal of the History of SexualityVol. 35(1)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Music History and Culture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.