A comparative study of trade metaphors across political genres during the U.S.-China trade war

Currently, applied metaphor analysis often focuses on metaphor use in a particular political genre of a single country, overlooking how metaphors legitimize dominant political ideologies across different political genres and different countries. This paper addresses this gap by proposing an innovative categorization of metaphorical functions to systematically examine how trade metaphors are used across three underexplored political genres to legitimize America’s populist-nationalist ideology of trade protectionism and China’s state-nationalist ideology of trade globalism during the U.S.-China trade war (2017–2021). The findings show that metaphor use varies by genre in the service of ideological legitimation. Quantitative analysis reveals that trade metaphors occur most frequently in the informational and persuasive textual genre (News Reports), less frequently in the involved and persuasive spoken genre (Remarks), and least in the abstract and formal textual genre (Policy Documents). Qualitative analysis further shows that the pragmatic functions of trade metaphors differ by genre in legitimizing trade ideologies. Trade metaphors in News Reports perform persuasive and offsite interactional functions; in Remarks, they serve persuasive and onsite interactional functions; in Policy Documents, they fulfill a textual function. These findings contribute to comparative metaphor analysis and comparative political discourse analysis by highlighting genre-dependent metaphor use. They also lay the groundwork for future research, including experimental studies on the real-world impact of trade metaphors across political genres. • This paper addresses the lack of cross-genre comparison in metaphor use. • It focuses on metaphorical functions across three underexplored political genres. • It examines how trade metaphors legitimize trade ideologies in China and the U.S. • The use of trade metaphors varies with communicative purposes of different genres. • Beyond persuasive functions, trade metaphors serve interactional or textual roles.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Language Sciences
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2026.101797
Primary Topic
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparative study of trade metaphors across political genres during the U.S.-China trade war

Xiaojuan Tan, Tina Krennmayr, Alan Cienki
Language Sciences
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
article

A comparative study of trade metaphors across political genres during the U.S.-China trade war

Xiaojuan Tan, Tina Krennmayr, Alan Cienki
article en

Abstract

Currently, applied metaphor analysis often focuses on metaphor use in a particular political genre of a single country, overlooking how metaphors legitimize dominant political ideologies across different political genres and different countries. This paper addresses this gap by proposing an innovative categorization of metaphorical functions to systematically examine how trade metaphors are used across three underexplored political genres to legitimize America’s populist-nationalist ideology of trade protectionism and China’s state-nationalist ideology of trade globalism during the U.S.-China trade war (2017–2021). The findings show that metaphor use varies by genre in the service of ideological legitimation. Quantitative analysis reveals that trade metaphors occur most frequently in the informational and persuasive textual genre (News Reports), less frequently in the involved and persuasive spoken genre (Remarks), and least in the abstract and formal textual genre (Policy Documents). Qualitative analysis further shows that the pragmatic functions of trade metaphors differ by genre in legitimizing trade ideologies. Trade metaphors in News Reports perform persuasive and offsite interactional functions; in Remarks, they serve persuasive and onsite interactional functions; in Policy Documents, they fulfill a textual function. These findings contribute to comparative metaphor analysis and comparative political discourse analysis by highlighting genre-dependent metaphor use. They also lay the groundwork for future research, including experimental studies on the real-world impact of trade metaphors across political genres. • This paper addresses the lack of cross-genre comparison in metaphor use. • It focuses on metaphorical functions across three underexplored political genres. • It examines how trade metaphors legitimize trade ideologies in China and the U.S. • The use of trade metaphors varies with communicative purposes of different genres. • Beyond persuasive functions, trade metaphors serve interactional or textual roles.

Language SciencesVol. 115
Hunan Normal University (CN), University of Amsterdam (NL), Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.