Cross Cultural Differences in Essentialist Beliefs about Religion Categories: Comparing Northern Ireland to the US

Abstract To examine cultural differences in beliefs about social categories, two studies examined whether there are differences between Northern Ireland and the US in the strength of essentialist beliefs about eleven social dimensions including culturally salient dimensions of religion and race. In both studies religion categories were essentialized more by participants in Northern Ireland who viewed them as more natural but no more cohesive than US participants. Essentialist beliefs about race categories did not differ cross-culturally. In general, these findings suggest that – as in the case of belief about religion categories in Northern Ireland – social categories may be essentialized because they are culturally salient or in the absence of salience – as in the case of beliefs about race categories in Northern Ireland – because of more general conceptual proclivities. These findings also suggest a potentially important role for ontological beliefs about religion categories in the formation of religious prejudice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cognition and Culture
Published
2025-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/15685373-12340229
Primary Topic
Religion and Society Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cross Cultural Differences in Essentialist Beliefs about Religion Categories: Comparing Northern Ireland to the US

John D. Coley, Kirsty Smyth, Meredith Cohen, R. Cole Eidson et al.
Journal of Cognition and Culture
Religion and Society Interactions
article

Cross Cultural Differences in Essentialist Beliefs about Religion Categories: Comparing Northern Ireland to the US

John D. Coley, Kirsty Smyth, Meredith Cohen, R. Cole Eidson, Aidan Feeney
article en

Abstract

Abstract To examine cultural differences in beliefs about social categories, two studies examined whether there are differences between Northern Ireland and the US in the strength of essentialist beliefs about eleven social dimensions including culturally salient dimensions of religion and race. In both studies religion categories were essentialized more by participants in Northern Ireland who viewed them as more natural but no more cohesive than US participants. Essentialist beliefs about race categories did not differ cross-culturally. In general, these findings suggest that – as in the case of belief about religion categories in Northern Ireland – social categories may be essentialized because they are culturally salient or in the absence of salience – as in the case of beliefs about race categories in Northern Ireland – because of more general conceptual proclivities. These findings also suggest a potentially important role for ontological beliefs about religion categories in the formation of religious prejudice.

Journal of Cognition and CultureVol. 26(1-2)
Queen's University Belfast (GB), Northeastern University (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Religion and Society Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.