Short-term outcomes of a micro-choice-based intervention for chronic low back pain: a quasi-experimental study

Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a leading cause of disability and reduced work participation worldwide. Its multifactorial nature—often lacking a clear pathological cause—poses significant challenges for effective treatment. This study reports short-term outcomes from a concentrated, interdisciplinary group-based intervention targeting patients with hard-to-treat CLBP. This study reports outcomes from the CLBP arm of a nonrandomized five-armed transdiagnostic, pre-post intervention trial (2020–2022); no control group or between-group comparisons are included. The intervention comprised SMART (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound) goal setting, multilevel exercise, patient education, and micro-choice strategies—small, intentional decisions aimed at enhancing functional capacity and reducing symptom-related vigilance—delivered in a concentrated group format. Outcomes were evaluated three months post-intervention and included disability (Oswestry Disability Index, ODI), pain intensity (NRS-11), work ability, medication use, sick leave status, and physical performance tests. Continuous outcomes were analysed using mixed-effects regression models to account for repeated measures, while categorical changes were assessed using symmetry tests for ordinal variables and McNemar’s test for binary variables. The majority in our cohort had low educational levels, were overweight, and welfare recipients, many had multisite pain, used daily pain medication and had a history of back surgery. At follow-up, most outcomes showed statistically significant improvement. Disability decreased by 5.9 points (-18%, 95% CI: 4.1–7.7), and low back pain intensity decreased by 1.3 points (-21%, 95% CI: 0.9–1.7). Work ability increased by 0.9 points (+ 22%, 95% CI: 0.4–1.5) and sit-to-stand repetitions increased by 3.6 (+ 27%, 95% CI: 2.6–4.7). Fifteen (17%) participants transitioned from sick leave to work, and 16 (18%) discontinued pain medication. Patient education, structured exercise, and the concentrated micro-choice-based intervention was associated with improved pain, disability, work ability, and physical function in a hard-to-treat CLBP population. Improvements due to regression to the mean are a possibility, therefore a randomized controlled trial is warranted to confirm efficacy. Clinicaltrials.gov (Identifier: NCT05234281), first submitted 26. May 2021.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-026-09635-x
Primary Topic
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Short-term outcomes of a micro-choice-based intervention for chronic low back pain: a quasi-experimental study

Andreas Tunset, Øystein Theodor Ødegaard-Olsen, Christoffer Børsheim, Gerd Kvale et al.
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
article

Short-term outcomes of a micro-choice-based intervention for chronic low back pain: a quasi-experimental study

Andreas Tunset, Øystein Theodor Ødegaard-Olsen, Christoffer Børsheim, Gerd Kvale, Jan Hartvigsen, Silje Mæland, Eirik Søfteland, Thomas Kadar, Sigurd W. Hystad
article en

Abstract

Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a leading cause of disability and reduced work participation worldwide. Its multifactorial nature—often lacking a clear pathological cause—poses significant challenges for effective treatment. This study reports short-term outcomes from a concentrated, interdisciplinary group-based intervention targeting patients with hard-to-treat CLBP. This study reports outcomes from the CLBP arm of a nonrandomized five-armed transdiagnostic, pre-post intervention trial (2020–2022); no control group or between-group comparisons are included. The intervention comprised SMART (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound) goal setting, multilevel exercise, patient education, and micro-choice strategies—small, intentional decisions aimed at enhancing functional capacity and reducing symptom-related vigilance—delivered in a concentrated group format. Outcomes were evaluated three months post-intervention and included disability (Oswestry Disability Index, ODI), pain intensity (NRS-11), work ability, medication use, sick leave status, and physical performance tests. Continuous outcomes were analysed using mixed-effects regression models to account for repeated measures, while categorical changes were assessed using symmetry tests for ordinal variables and McNemar’s test for binary variables. The majority in our cohort had low educational levels, were overweight, and welfare recipients, many had multisite pain, used daily pain medication and had a history of back surgery. At follow-up, most outcomes showed statistically significant improvement. Disability decreased by 5.9 points (-18%, 95% CI: 4.1–7.7), and low back pain intensity decreased by 1.3 points (-21%, 95% CI: 0.9–1.7). Work ability increased by 0.9 points (+ 22%, 95% CI: 0.4–1.5) and sit-to-stand repetitions increased by 3.6 (+ 27%, 95% CI: 2.6–4.7). Fifteen (17%) participants transitioned from sick leave to work, and 16 (18%) discontinued pain medication. Patient education, structured exercise, and the concentrated micro-choice-based intervention was associated with improved pain, disability, work ability, and physical function in a hard-to-treat CLBP population. Improvements due to regression to the mean are a possibility, therefore a randomized controlled trial is warranted to confirm efficacy. Clinicaltrials.gov (Identifier: NCT05234281), first submitted 26. May 2021.

BMC Musculoskeletal DisordersVol. 27(1)
University of Southern Denmark (DK), Haukeland University Hospital (NO), 3T Helse (Norway) (NO), University of Bergen (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.