Socioeconomic Disparities in E-Cigarette Use: Patterns, Mechanisms, and Equity Implications

This critical review examines the complex relationship between socioeconomic status (SES) and electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) use, addressing how SES influences patterns of e-cigarette use. It explores whether e-cigarettes serve as a harm reduction tool for disadvantaged populations or exacerbate existing tobacco-related disparities. The review also highlights key mediating mechanisms and policy implications of SES-related differences in e-cigarette use. Evidence points to divergent trends in e-cigarette use across SES groups. Initially, higher-SES adults who smoke were more likely to adopt e-cigarettes for smoking cessation, reflecting greater health awareness and access. However, recent data in several high-income countries show increasing uptake among lower-SES groups, driven by affordability, targeted marketing, and limited access to conventional smoking cessation support. Adolescents in disadvantaged settings may face higher exposure to pro-vaping cues across retail, peer networks, and social media, alongside weaker access to high-quality health information. Dual use (concurrent smoking and vaping) appears more prevalent in low-SES populations, raising concerns about sustained nicotine dependence and limited support for a complete switch from smoking to exclusive vaping. Structural factors such as income, education, occupation, and neighborhood/area-level deprivation, along with health literacy, shape vaping behaviors and help explain observed SES gaps. Regulatory measures such as flavour restrictions and taxation may have uneven effects across socioeconomic groups: they can help prevent youth uptake but may also create barriers for low-income adults who smoke and are trying to switch, with a risk of widening health inequalities. The findings underline the dual role of e-cigarettes: while they may offer harm reduction opportunity for some people who smoke, their full benefits are not yet evenly distributed, with lower-SES groups facing barriers to complete smoking cessation. Equity-focused interventions, including tailored smoking cessation programs, accessible harm reduction pathways, improved health literacy, and balanced regulations, are critical to ensuring e-cigarettes reduce rather than reinforce socioeconomic disparities in smoking-related health outcomes. Future research should prioritise longitudinal and intersectional studies, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, to address existing gaps in understanding.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Addiction Reports
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40429-026-00716-4
Primary Topic
Smoking Behavior and Cessation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Socioeconomic Disparities in E-Cigarette Use: Patterns, Mechanisms, and Equity Implications

Yusuff Adebayo Adebisi
Current Addiction Reports
Smoking Behavior and Cessation
article

Socioeconomic Disparities in E-Cigarette Use: Patterns, Mechanisms, and Equity Implications

Yusuff Adebayo Adebisi
article en

Abstract

This critical review examines the complex relationship between socioeconomic status (SES) and electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) use, addressing how SES influences patterns of e-cigarette use. It explores whether e-cigarettes serve as a harm reduction tool for disadvantaged populations or exacerbate existing tobacco-related disparities. The review also highlights key mediating mechanisms and policy implications of SES-related differences in e-cigarette use. Evidence points to divergent trends in e-cigarette use across SES groups. Initially, higher-SES adults who smoke were more likely to adopt e-cigarettes for smoking cessation, reflecting greater health awareness and access. However, recent data in several high-income countries show increasing uptake among lower-SES groups, driven by affordability, targeted marketing, and limited access to conventional smoking cessation support. Adolescents in disadvantaged settings may face higher exposure to pro-vaping cues across retail, peer networks, and social media, alongside weaker access to high-quality health information. Dual use (concurrent smoking and vaping) appears more prevalent in low-SES populations, raising concerns about sustained nicotine dependence and limited support for a complete switch from smoking to exclusive vaping. Structural factors such as income, education, occupation, and neighborhood/area-level deprivation, along with health literacy, shape vaping behaviors and help explain observed SES gaps. Regulatory measures such as flavour restrictions and taxation may have uneven effects across socioeconomic groups: they can help prevent youth uptake but may also create barriers for low-income adults who smoke and are trying to switch, with a risk of widening health inequalities. The findings underline the dual role of e-cigarettes: while they may offer harm reduction opportunity for some people who smoke, their full benefits are not yet evenly distributed, with lower-SES groups facing barriers to complete smoking cessation. Equity-focused interventions, including tailored smoking cessation programs, accessible harm reduction pathways, improved health literacy, and balanced regulations, are critical to ensuring e-cigarettes reduce rather than reinforce socioeconomic disparities in smoking-related health outcomes. Future research should prioritise longitudinal and intersectional studies, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, to address existing gaps in understanding.

Current Addiction ReportsVol. 13(1)
University of Glasgow (GB)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Smoking Behavior and Cessation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.