Quantifying the Spatial Burden of Informal Ride Provision for Older Adults Using Activity Space Analysis and GIS

Older adults’ well-being is strongly shaped by their capacity to navigate and access places beyond their immediate surroundings. Lack of adequate transportation can limit their access to health care, services, and social opportunities. For older adults in the United States who do not or no longer drive, getting private automobile rides from others is their primary mode of transportation, but this reliance can burden their ride providers. Measuring and assessing the geospatial burden of providing rides is important for research and policies that aim to address both negative effects for ride providers and older adults’ unmet travel needs. In this manuscript, we propose an approach that collects data to assess ride providers’ geospatial activity spaces for their own routine activities and for providing rides. By comparing the two activity spaces, we propose a method to operationalize geospatial ride-providing burden, using three potential burden indicators. Using data from an exploratory study (N = 12 ride providers), we apply these burden indicators and correlate them to other indicators of burden (i.e., days/month giving rides, monetary costs, missed work, increased stress). We conclude that the share of the activity space for providing rides falling beyond the area of the ride provider’s routine personal travel (what we call Burden Indicator B) may be a useful indicator of geospatial burden of providing rides.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi15020086
Primary Topic
Older Adults Driving Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantifying the Spatial Burden of Informal Ride Provision for Older Adults Using Activity Space Analysis and GIS

Rebecca L. Mauldin, Rupal Parekh, Swasati Handique, Mahshid Haque et al.
ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information
Older Adults Driving Studies
article

Quantifying the Spatial Burden of Informal Ride Provision for Older Adults Using Activity Space Analysis and GIS

Rebecca L. Mauldin, Rupal Parekh, Swasati Handique, Mahshid Haque, Soeun Jang, Stephen P. Mattingly
article en

Abstract

Older adults’ well-being is strongly shaped by their capacity to navigate and access places beyond their immediate surroundings. Lack of adequate transportation can limit their access to health care, services, and social opportunities. For older adults in the United States who do not or no longer drive, getting private automobile rides from others is their primary mode of transportation, but this reliance can burden their ride providers. Measuring and assessing the geospatial burden of providing rides is important for research and policies that aim to address both negative effects for ride providers and older adults’ unmet travel needs. In this manuscript, we propose an approach that collects data to assess ride providers’ geospatial activity spaces for their own routine activities and for providing rides. By comparing the two activity spaces, we propose a method to operationalize geospatial ride-providing burden, using three potential burden indicators. Using data from an exploratory study (N = 12 ride providers), we apply these burden indicators and correlate them to other indicators of burden (i.e., days/month giving rides, monetary costs, missed work, increased stress). We conclude that the share of the activity space for providing rides falling beyond the area of the ride provider’s routine personal travel (what we call Burden Indicator B) may be a useful indicator of geospatial burden of providing rides.

ISPRS International Journal of Geo-InformationVol. 15(2)
University of Hartford (US), The University of Texas at Arlington (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Older Adults Driving Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.