Including patient and public contributors on clinical trial Independent Data Monitoring Committees (IDMCs)

The findings of this project allowed us to develop, review and refine the training materials and resources required for public contributors to meaningfully take part in IDMCs. Furthermore, feedback received from public contributors, trial teams and IDMC chairs was largely positive and suggests that the inclusion of public contributors, when adequate training and resources are provided, is feasible, can enhance the work of these committees and is welcomed by those involved. Limitations to the research and future work have been identified to further assess the impact of including public contributors in IDMCs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Trials
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-026-09559-w
Primary Topic
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Including patient and public contributors on clinical trial Independent Data Monitoring Committees (IDMCs)

Irene Soulsby, Geoff Saunders, Cherish Boxall, Elizabeth Allaway et al.
Trials
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
article

Including patient and public contributors on clinical trial Independent Data Monitoring Committees (IDMCs)

Irene Soulsby, Geoff Saunders, Cherish Boxall, Elizabeth Allaway, Louise Stanton, Nicole Keyworth, Gareth Griffiths, Joshua Caddy
article en

Abstract

The findings of this project allowed us to develop, review and refine the training materials and resources required for public contributors to meaningfully take part in IDMCs. Furthermore, feedback received from public contributors, trial teams and IDMC chairs was largely positive and suggests that the inclusion of public contributors, when adequate training and resources are provided, is feasible, can enhance the work of these committees and is welcomed by those involved. Limitations to the research and future work have been identified to further assess the impact of including public contributors in IDMCs.

TrialsVol. 27(1)
University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust (GB), NIHR Evaluation Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre (GB), University of Southampton (GB)
Cancer Research UK
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.