A road toward nature neutrality? Incorporating biodiversity restoration into life cycle assessment of road construction

Abstract Road construction irreversibly alters landscapes, fragments ecosystems, and reduces local biodiversity. The sector increasingly intends to mitigate these impacts, aiming for nature neutrality, i.e. full compensation for both the area and quality of ecosystems lost through restoration. Local soils are often reused for restoration after road construction, yet it remains unclear to what extent this practice helps achieve nature neutrality. We assessed the potential consequences of four scenarios in a planned road project through a natural area in Norway: no road construction (reference) and three levels of soil reuse—low, medium, and total reuse, the latter including off-site restoration. Plant species responses to soil management were tested through a soil translocation experiment. We evaluated full and poor recovery trajectories of plant species diversity at the road site, biogenic carbon stock change, and machinery emissions over 75 years. We applied a site-specific life cycle impact assessment method using the potentially disappeared fraction of plant species and developed a complementary metric, the potentially restored fraction. Species loss fractions were used to estimate the off-site restoration area required to reach nature neutrality. Total soil reuse reduced plant species loss by 70% and CO₂-equivalent emissions by 45% compared to low reuse. However, even in this scenario at least 26% of the reference plant species richness was lost and 1180 t CO 2eq emitted. Machine use emissions contributed <2% of total CO 2eq emissions. Achieving nature neutrality in terms of plant species richness would require restoration of areas 26%–41%, 39%–54%, and 123% the size of the road construction site under total, medium, and low soil reuse, respectively, with greater needs under poor recovery. Our results show that reusing natural soils can jointly reduce biodiversity loss and emissions, but attaining nature neutrality demands large off-site restoration areas that may not always be available.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Research Infrastructure and Sustainability
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/2634-4505/ae46d8
Primary Topic
Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A road toward nature neutrality? Incorporating biodiversity restoration into life cycle assessment of road construction

Rolf André Bohne, Bente J. Graae, Hrefna Rún Vignisdóttir, Martijn L. Vandegehuchte et al.
Environmental Research Infrastructure and Sustainability
Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation
article

A road toward nature neutrality? Incorporating biodiversity restoration into life cycle assessment of road construction

Rolf André Bohne, Bente J. Graae, Hrefna Rún Vignisdóttir, Martijn L. Vandegehuchte, Eryn Lum, Martine Alexandra Andersen Hennig, Katrin Knoth
article en

Abstract

Abstract Road construction irreversibly alters landscapes, fragments ecosystems, and reduces local biodiversity. The sector increasingly intends to mitigate these impacts, aiming for nature neutrality, i.e. full compensation for both the area and quality of ecosystems lost through restoration. Local soils are often reused for restoration after road construction, yet it remains unclear to what extent this practice helps achieve nature neutrality. We assessed the potential consequences of four scenarios in a planned road project through a natural area in Norway: no road construction (reference) and three levels of soil reuse—low, medium, and total reuse, the latter including off-site restoration. Plant species responses to soil management were tested through a soil translocation experiment. We evaluated full and poor recovery trajectories of plant species diversity at the road site, biogenic carbon stock change, and machinery emissions over 75 years. We applied a site-specific life cycle impact assessment method using the potentially disappeared fraction of plant species and developed a complementary metric, the potentially restored fraction. Species loss fractions were used to estimate the off-site restoration area required to reach nature neutrality. Total soil reuse reduced plant species loss by 70% and CO₂-equivalent emissions by 45% compared to low reuse. However, even in this scenario at least 26% of the reference plant species richness was lost and 1180 t CO 2eq emitted. Machine use emissions contributed <2% of total CO 2eq emissions. Achieving nature neutrality in terms of plant species richness would require restoration of areas 26%–41%, 39%–54%, and 123% the size of the road construction site under total, medium, and low soil reuse, respectively, with greater needs under poor recovery. Our results show that reusing natural soils can jointly reduce biodiversity loss and emissions, but attaining nature neutrality demands large off-site restoration areas that may not always be available.

Environmental Research Infrastructure and SustainabilityVol. 6(1)
SINTEF (NO), Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.