Enriching Communication Channels and Styles for Public Participation in Environmental Justice

Environmental justice is closely related to corrective justice, procedural justice, and meaningful public participation. Effective communication of research-based evidence is critical but often overlooked in environmental decision-making processes. This article examines how scientific research findings frequently fail to influence policy decisions due to communication barriers between researchers, communities, and decision-makers. We propose that effective science communication strategies, including the accessible translation of complex findings into formats understandable to diverse stakeholders, can bridge this gap. This article advocates for adopting journalistic communication styles, strengthening evidence-based arguments, and strategically using mass media channels as specific approaches to simultaneously motivate greater public participation in decision-making processes although making scientific evidence more accessible and compelling for policymakers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Justice
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/19394071261419369
Primary Topic
Environmental Justice and Health Disparities
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enriching Communication Channels and Styles for Public Participation in Environmental Justice

Usman Idris, Sriyono Sriyono, Aldrin Watson Gainau, Ilham Ilham et al.
Environmental Justice
Environmental Justice and Health Disparities
article

Enriching Communication Channels and Styles for Public Participation in Environmental Justice

Usman Idris, Sriyono Sriyono, Aldrin Watson Gainau, Ilham Ilham, Marlina Flassy, M. Zaenul Muttaqin
article en

Abstract

Environmental justice is closely related to corrective justice, procedural justice, and meaningful public participation. Effective communication of research-based evidence is critical but often overlooked in environmental decision-making processes. This article examines how scientific research findings frequently fail to influence policy decisions due to communication barriers between researchers, communities, and decision-makers. We propose that effective science communication strategies, including the accessible translation of complex findings into formats understandable to diverse stakeholders, can bridge this gap. This article advocates for adopting journalistic communication styles, strengthening evidence-based arguments, and strategically using mass media channels as specific approaches to simultaneously motivate greater public participation in decision-making processes although making scientific evidence more accessible and compelling for policymakers.

Environmental Justice
Universitas Airlangga (ID), Cenderawasih University (ID), Muhammadiyah University of Makassar (ID), State University of Makassar (ID), Hasanuddin University (ID)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Environmental Justice and Health Disparities
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.