A Review of Quality Assurance Frameworks in African Universities: Implications for Policy and Practice

HRMARS - Quality assurance (QA) underpins credibility, recognition, and student outcomes in African higher education; yet, practices remain uneven and overly compliance-driven due to resource constraints. The study synthesises peer-reviewed evidence (2005–2025) on QA frameworks, mechanisms, outcomes, and enabling or constraining factors, and proposes an institutional roadmap. A systematic literature review was conducted using multi-database searching, explicit eligibility criteria, dual screening, and a Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) / Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) appraisal, followed by thematic synthesis and PRISMA-aligned reporting. Five themes emerged—structures and governance, resources and capacity, scope imbalance, quality culture, and regional harmonisation—each accompanied by graded confidence statements. The study offers actionable guidance for universities, regulators, and partners and outlines a targeted research agenda.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development
Published
2026-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarped/v15-i1/26722
Primary Topic
Higher Education Governance and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Review of Quality Assurance Frameworks in African Universities: Implications for Policy and Practice

Matilda Obeng-Kyereh
International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development
Higher Education Governance and Development
article

A Review of Quality Assurance Frameworks in African Universities: Implications for Policy and Practice

Matilda Obeng-Kyereh
article en

Abstract

HRMARS - Quality assurance (QA) underpins credibility, recognition, and student outcomes in African higher education; yet, practices remain uneven and overly compliance-driven due to resource constraints. The study synthesises peer-reviewed evidence (2005–2025) on QA frameworks, mechanisms, outcomes, and enabling or constraining factors, and proposes an institutional roadmap. A systematic literature review was conducted using multi-database searching, explicit eligibility criteria, dual screening, and a Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) / Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) appraisal, followed by thematic synthesis and PRISMA-aligned reporting. Five themes emerged—structures and governance, resources and capacity, scope imbalance, quality culture, and regional harmonisation—each accompanied by graded confidence statements. The study offers actionable guidance for universities, regulators, and partners and outlines a targeted research agenda.

International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and DevelopmentVol. 15(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Higher Education Governance and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Review of Quality Assurance Frameworks in African Universities: Implications for Policy and Practice — Matilda Obeng-Kyereh · International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS