Two or Three Confusions About Vibrations

Road traffic noise is considered the largest contributor to excessive noise exposure levels in Europe. Central to this type of noise is what is called “rolling noise.” This article emerges from an ethnographic encounter with a group of individuals in Greater Paris who are protesting road traffic noise, not as noise, but as vibrations. But is there a difference between noise and vibration? Why are vibrations not included within noise regulations? Is it a question of sensation? Is there a sense of vibration? If STS has shown how objects of knowledge, the senses, and bodies are assembled in social, political, and technological configurations, this article describes how vibrations and their sensory experiences slip out of them. Through a brief ethnographic encounter and a historical narrative, this article is about two or three confusions: between noise and vibration, the senses, and confusion as a form of knowledge itself. It is interested in how the sensory knowledge of vibration blurs sensory categories and challenges the bodily model that environmental regulations rely on. While vibrations have opened up reflections on other ways of sensing, they also provide an opportunity to think with, and not against, confusion as a form of knowing in uncertainty.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Science Technology & Human Values
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/01622439251410537
Primary Topic
Noise Effects and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Two or Three Confusions About Vibrations

Brett Mommersteeg
Science Technology & Human Values
Noise Effects and Management
article

Two or Three Confusions About Vibrations

Brett Mommersteeg
article en

Abstract

Road traffic noise is considered the largest contributor to excessive noise exposure levels in Europe. Central to this type of noise is what is called “rolling noise.” This article emerges from an ethnographic encounter with a group of individuals in Greater Paris who are protesting road traffic noise, not as noise, but as vibrations. But is there a difference between noise and vibration? Why are vibrations not included within noise regulations? Is it a question of sensation? Is there a sense of vibration? If STS has shown how objects of knowledge, the senses, and bodies are assembled in social, political, and technological configurations, this article describes how vibrations and their sensory experiences slip out of them. Through a brief ethnographic encounter and a historical narrative, this article is about two or three confusions: between noise and vibration, the senses, and confusion as a form of knowledge itself. It is interested in how the sensory knowledge of vibration blurs sensory categories and challenges the bodily model that environmental regulations rely on. While vibrations have opened up reflections on other ways of sensing, they also provide an opportunity to think with, and not against, confusion as a form of knowing in uncertainty.

Science Technology & Human Values
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Noise Effects and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Two or Three Confusions About Vibrations — Brett Mommersteeg · Science Technology & Human Values (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS