Cultural Landscape Planning in Rural Contexts: A Comparative Appraisal of GIS-based and other Participatory Methods

The European Landscape Convention (2000) is the first European charter dedicated to all landscapes, emphasising their importance for cultural identity and well-being, and promoting community engagement in their management and planning. Various participatory planning methods have been advanced in line with this charter, yet these methods have not been widely applied to cultural landscapes in rural contexts. To ad-dress this gap, this study evaluates the added value of methods harness-ing Geographic Information Systems (GIS) for community participation in rural cultural landscape settings. It does so by comparing five European participatory experiences that use both GIS-based and non-GIS-based methods for landscape planning in rural contexts. The main findings pro-vide insights into the advantages and disadvantages of various participa-tory methods based on inclusiveness, effectiveness, and repeatability. GIS-based methods show great potential in integrating citizen inputs into landscape planning, particularly by engaging a larger audience and facili-tating discussion and exchange of spatial ideas through digital maps. Fur-thermore, the authors argue that simplified GIS-based methods could help disseminate the European Landscape Convention principles of com-munity engagement in landscape planning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Landscape Online
Published
2026-02-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3097/lo.2026.1146
Primary Topic
Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cultural Landscape Planning in Rural Contexts: A Comparative Appraisal of GIS-based and other Participatory Methods

Marta Ducci, G.-J Burgers, Ron Janssen
Landscape Online
Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
article

Cultural Landscape Planning in Rural Contexts: A Comparative Appraisal of GIS-based and other Participatory Methods

Marta Ducci, G.-J Burgers, Ron Janssen
article en

Abstract

The European Landscape Convention (2000) is the first European charter dedicated to all landscapes, emphasising their importance for cultural identity and well-being, and promoting community engagement in their management and planning. Various participatory planning methods have been advanced in line with this charter, yet these methods have not been widely applied to cultural landscapes in rural contexts. To ad-dress this gap, this study evaluates the added value of methods harness-ing Geographic Information Systems (GIS) for community participation in rural cultural landscape settings. It does so by comparing five European participatory experiences that use both GIS-based and non-GIS-based methods for landscape planning in rural contexts. The main findings pro-vide insights into the advantages and disadvantages of various participa-tory methods based on inclusiveness, effectiveness, and repeatability. GIS-based methods show great potential in integrating citizen inputs into landscape planning, particularly by engaging a larger audience and facili-tating discussion and exchange of spatial ideas through digital maps. Fur-thermore, the authors argue that simplified GIS-based methods could help disseminate the European Landscape Convention principles of com-munity engagement in landscape planning.

Landscape Online
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.