Measuring Critical Care Pharmacist Value: A Scoping Review of the Effect of Critical Care Pharmacist Activities on Clinically Relevant Outcomes

ABSTRACT Background Critical care pharmacists (CCPs) are recognized as essential members of the intensive care unit (ICU) multidisciplinary patient care team, yet still find it necessary to justify their presence. Therefore, it is important to understand which CCP activities provide the most value to patient outcomes to inform discussions about CCP practice and guide development of quality measures (QM) and key performance indicators (KPI). Methods We aimed to conduct a scoping review of studies that assessed the effect of CCP patient care activities on clinically relevant outcomes in an intensive care unit (ICU) to guide development of QM/KPI. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, Embase, Healthcare Administration Databases (via ProQuest), PubMed, and Web of Science from 1980 through October 1, 2025 were searched using the following search terms: “pharmacist,” “critical care,” “critically ill,” “intensive care units,” and “ICU.” Results The search strategy retrieved 5971 articles of which 71 studies were included. Most studies were single‐center evaluations, and the most common areas of CCP activity were antimicrobial stewardship (17 studies, 24%), sedation optimization (11 studies, 15%), pharmacotherapy management (10 studies, 14%), and medication safety (8 studies, 11%). The most common outcomes assessed were ICU length of stay (LOS) (55 studies, 77%), mortality (44 studies, 62%), hospital LOS (29 studies, 41%), duration of mechanical ventilation (20 studies, 28%), and medication errors (11 studies, 15%). Forty‐two studies (59%) showed a statistically significant difference in the outcomes assessed favoring the CCP activity. Multiple QM/KPI were derived from specific CCP activities performed in these studies. Conclusions Many studies documented improvements in clinically relevant outcomes because of the care provided by a CCP. QM/KPI derived from CCP activities performed in these studies may be useful in standardizing CCP practice and workflow and further establish CCP value.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JACCP JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CLINICAL PHARMACY
Published
2026-02-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jac5.70188
Primary Topic
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measuring Critical Care Pharmacist Value: A Scoping Review of the Effect of Critical Care Pharmacist Activities on Clinically Relevant Outcomes

Nadia Ferguson, Mitchell S. Buckley, Nicole M. Acquisto, Devin Holden et al.
JACCP JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CLINICAL PHARMACY
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
article

Measuring Critical Care Pharmacist Value: A Scoping Review of the Effect of Critical Care Pharmacist Activities on Clinically Relevant Outcomes

Nadia Ferguson, Mitchell S. Buckley, Nicole M. Acquisto, Devin Holden, Christine M. Groth, Ifeoma Mary Eche, Sue Lahey
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Critical care pharmacists (CCPs) are recognized as essential members of the intensive care unit (ICU) multidisciplinary patient care team, yet still find it necessary to justify their presence. Therefore, it is important to understand which CCP activities provide the most value to patient outcomes to inform discussions about CCP practice and guide development of quality measures (QM) and key performance indicators (KPI). Methods We aimed to conduct a scoping review of studies that assessed the effect of CCP patient care activities on clinically relevant outcomes in an intensive care unit (ICU) to guide development of QM/KPI. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, Embase, Healthcare Administration Databases (via ProQuest), PubMed, and Web of Science from 1980 through October 1, 2025 were searched using the following search terms: “pharmacist,” “critical care,” “critically ill,” “intensive care units,” and “ICU.” Results The search strategy retrieved 5971 articles of which 71 studies were included. Most studies were single‐center evaluations, and the most common areas of CCP activity were antimicrobial stewardship (17 studies, 24%), sedation optimization (11 studies, 15%), pharmacotherapy management (10 studies, 14%), and medication safety (8 studies, 11%). The most common outcomes assessed were ICU length of stay (LOS) (55 studies, 77%), mortality (44 studies, 62%), hospital LOS (29 studies, 41%), duration of mechanical ventilation (20 studies, 28%), and medication errors (11 studies, 15%). Forty‐two studies (59%) showed a statistically significant difference in the outcomes assessed favoring the CCP activity. Multiple QM/KPI were derived from specific CCP activities performed in these studies. Conclusions Many studies documented improvements in clinically relevant outcomes because of the care provided by a CCP. QM/KPI derived from CCP activities performed in these studies may be useful in standardizing CCP practice and workflow and further establish CCP value.

JACCP JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CLINICAL PHARMACYVol. 9(3)
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US), Montefiore Medical Center (US), University of Rochester Medical Center (US), Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences (US), Albany Research Institute (US), Arizona Research Center (US), Albany Medical Center Hospital (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.