Acquirer Strategic Orientations, Integration Decisions, and Performance

Abstract Integration decisions are not isolated, as they are embedded in an organizational context. Using a multi‐country sample (Nordics, German speaking Europe, and China) of small‐ and medium‐sized acquirers, we explore the influence of firm strategic orientations on how managers conceptualize acquisitions, make integration decisions, and impact acquisition performance. Both market‐ and entrepreneurial‐oriented firms coordinate activities following an acquisition, but they do so differently. Entrepreneurial‐oriented acquirers use human integration to align target managers with common goals and reinforce their decision‐making autonomy. In contrast, market‐oriented acquirers strive for functional integration and use human integration to reduce target firm managers' decision‐making autonomy. Thus, achieving coordination after an acquisition can follow different paths that are closely aligned with the strategic orientation of the acquirer. In other words, different strategic orientations guide managers' decisions, resulting in different paths to acquisition success.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Management Studies
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.70082
Primary Topic
Innovation and Knowledge Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Acquirer Strategic Orientations, Integration Decisions, and Performance

Nir N. Brueller, Florian Bauer, Qingxiong Weng, Svante Schriber et al.
Journal of Management Studies
Innovation and Knowledge Management
article

Acquirer Strategic Orientations, Integration Decisions, and Performance

Nir N. Brueller, Florian Bauer, Qingxiong Weng, Svante Schriber, Jeffrey G. Covin, David R. King
article en

Abstract

Abstract Integration decisions are not isolated, as they are embedded in an organizational context. Using a multi‐country sample (Nordics, German speaking Europe, and China) of small‐ and medium‐sized acquirers, we explore the influence of firm strategic orientations on how managers conceptualize acquisitions, make integration decisions, and impact acquisition performance. Both market‐ and entrepreneurial‐oriented firms coordinate activities following an acquisition, but they do so differently. Entrepreneurial‐oriented acquirers use human integration to align target managers with common goals and reinforce their decision‐making autonomy. In contrast, market‐oriented acquirers strive for functional integration and use human integration to reduce target firm managers' decision‐making autonomy. Thus, achieving coordination after an acquisition can follow different paths that are closely aligned with the strategic orientation of the acquirer. In other words, different strategic orientations guide managers' decisions, resulting in different paths to acquisition success.

Journal of Management Studies
Florida State University (US), University of Science and Technology (YE), University of Wyoming (US), Stockholm University (SE), Tel Aviv University (IL), University of Bristol (GB), Wyoming Department of Education (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Innovation and Knowledge Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Acquirer Strategic Orientations, Integration Decisions, and Performance — Nir N. Brueller, Florian Bauer, et al. · Journal of Management Studies (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS