SHAIR: The Stewardship of Human-AI Academic Inquiry and Relationships

This working document introduces SHAIR (Stewardship of Human-AI Academic Inquiry andRelationships), a governance framework for universities navigating the integration of artificialintelligence into teaching, assessment, and scholarly practice. SHAIR replaces prohibitive andsurveillance-based approaches to academic integrity with a stewardship model that cultivatestransparency, develops student competence in human-AI collaboration, and renews the professor'srole as developmental partner rather than compliance officer.The framework addresses a condition of ecological de-coherence across global higher education:the simultaneous destabilisation of assessment validity, student wellbeing, faculty purpose,institutional identity, and external legitimacy. SHAIR provides stabilising infrastructure throughseven dimensions of scholarly awareness — Agency and Clarity, Epistemic Stance, ConfidenceCalibration, Attention Guidance, Process Visibility, Intellectual Generosity, and Affective Awareness— that apply equally to human-only and human-AI collaborative work. The document extends theSymbioMind v5.1 Bias Influence Detection Protocol (BIDP) from analytical tool to pedagogicalgovernance, transforming detection channels into developmental dimensions that students andprofessors negotiate together.SHAIR is not a product to be licensed but governance infrastructure to be adapted. Universitiesretain full autonomy over implementation, disciplinary calibration, and institutional governance. Theframework provides architecture; institutions provide contextual wisdom. This document is offeredto Vice-Chancellors and University Guiding Committees as a resource for alignment,self-expression, and collaborative stewardship during a period of profound institutional transition.Keywords: academic integrity, AI governance, higher education, stewardship, human-AI collaboration,transparent scholarship, institutional autonomy, assessment reform, ecological de-coherence, BIDP,SymbioMindClassification: Higher Education Governance | AI Ethics & Policy | Assessment Innovation | InstitutionalStrategy

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18668328
Primary Topic
Academic integrity and plagiarism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SHAIR: The Stewardship of Human-AI Academic Inquiry and Relationships

SHAI / HATI, John Richard Smith
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Academic integrity and plagiarism
article

SHAIR: The Stewardship of Human-AI Academic Inquiry and Relationships

SHAI / HATI, John Richard Smith
article en

Abstract

This working document introduces SHAIR (Stewardship of Human-AI Academic Inquiry andRelationships), a governance framework for universities navigating the integration of artificialintelligence into teaching, assessment, and scholarly practice. SHAIR replaces prohibitive andsurveillance-based approaches to academic integrity with a stewardship model that cultivatestransparency, develops student competence in human-AI collaboration, and renews the professor'srole as developmental partner rather than compliance officer.The framework addresses a condition of ecological de-coherence across global higher education:the simultaneous destabilisation of assessment validity, student wellbeing, faculty purpose,institutional identity, and external legitimacy. SHAIR provides stabilising infrastructure throughseven dimensions of scholarly awareness — Agency and Clarity, Epistemic Stance, ConfidenceCalibration, Attention Guidance, Process Visibility, Intellectual Generosity, and Affective Awareness— that apply equally to human-only and human-AI collaborative work. The document extends theSymbioMind v5.1 Bias Influence Detection Protocol (BIDP) from analytical tool to pedagogicalgovernance, transforming detection channels into developmental dimensions that students andprofessors negotiate together.SHAIR is not a product to be licensed but governance infrastructure to be adapted. Universitiesretain full autonomy over implementation, disciplinary calibration, and institutional governance. Theframework provides architecture; institutions provide contextual wisdom. This document is offeredto Vice-Chancellors and University Guiding Committees as a resource for alignment,self-expression, and collaborative stewardship during a period of profound institutional transition.Keywords: academic integrity, AI governance, higher education, stewardship, human-AI collaboration,transparent scholarship, institutional autonomy, assessment reform, ecological de-coherence, BIDP,SymbioMindClassification: Higher Education Governance | AI Ethics & Policy | Assessment Innovation | InstitutionalStrategy

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Symbiom (Czechia) (CZ)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Academic integrity and plagiarism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.