Biocompatible Ionic Liquids for Sustainable Poly(ethylene terephthalate) Degradation: Conventional vs Microwave Heating Approaches

This study examines three choline-based ionic liquids─choline glycinate, choline phosphate, and choline acetate─as catalysts for poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) depolymerization under conventional and microwave heating. Choline glycinate maintained 88–90% PET conversion across both heating methods through its dual-functionality hydrogen bonding network. Choline phosphate and acetate showed method-dependent performance: 90% conversion under conventional heating versus 45–60% under microwave conditions due to viscosity and bonding limitations. All three ionic liquids tolerated up to 30 wt % water under conventional heating and 10 wt % under microwave heating, eliminating dehydration requirements. The heating method controlled product selectivity: conventional heating produced terephthalic acid exclusively, while microwave conditions yielded mixed terephthalic acid and bis(2-hydroxyethyl) terephthalate potentially through water nanodroplets creating localized hotspots. Ionic liquid basicity controls conversion efficiency while heating rate determines product distribution. These results provide a framework for designing rapid, predictable PET recycling processes using biocompatible catalysts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.5c12169
Primary Topic
biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Biocompatible Ionic Liquids for Sustainable Poly(ethylene terephthalate) Degradation: Conventional vs Microwave Heating Approaches

Gavin R. Flematti, H. Li, Rob Atkin, Zahra Mohammadizadeh Tahroudi et al.
ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering
biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
article

Biocompatible Ionic Liquids for Sustainable Poly(ethylene terephthalate) Degradation: Conventional vs Microwave Heating Approaches

Gavin R. Flematti, H. Li, Rob Atkin, Zahra Mohammadizadeh Tahroudi, Georg Fritz
article en

Abstract

This study examines three choline-based ionic liquids─choline glycinate, choline phosphate, and choline acetate─as catalysts for poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) depolymerization under conventional and microwave heating. Choline glycinate maintained 88–90% PET conversion across both heating methods through its dual-functionality hydrogen bonding network. Choline phosphate and acetate showed method-dependent performance: 90% conversion under conventional heating versus 45–60% under microwave conditions due to viscosity and bonding limitations. All three ionic liquids tolerated up to 30 wt % water under conventional heating and 10 wt % under microwave heating, eliminating dehydration requirements. The heating method controlled product selectivity: conventional heating produced terephthalic acid exclusively, while microwave conditions yielded mixed terephthalic acid and bis(2-hydroxyethyl) terephthalate potentially through water nanodroplets creating localized hotspots. Ionic liquid basicity controls conversion efficiency while heating rate determines product distribution. These results provide a framework for designing rapid, predictable PET recycling processes using biocompatible catalysts.

ACS Sustainable Chemistry & EngineeringVol. 14(8)
The University of Western Australia (AU)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.