Abstract PS4-10-01: Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors plus chemotherapy in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Background Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive subtype with limited treatment options and poor prognosis. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown efficacy in the early-stage setting when combined with chemotherapy. We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate their efficacy in terms of event-free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS), and pathological complete response (pCR). Methods We performed a systematic literature search of PubMed, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov to identify randomized controlled trials comparing neoadjuvant or perioperative chemotherapy with or without ICIs in early-stage TNBC. Eligible trials reported on at least one of the following outcomes: EFS, OS, or pCR. Study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment were conducted independently by two reviewers, with discrepancies resolved by consensus. Hazard ratios (HRs) were pooled for EFS and OS using inverse-variance weighting. For pCR, both risk difference (RD) and risk ratio (RR) were calculated using Mantel-Haenszel methods. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic. Pre-specified subgroup and sensitivity analyses were conducted, and publication bias was evaluated via funnel plot asymmetry. The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO (ID: CRD420251082981). Results Six phase II-III trials (KEYNOTE-522, IMpassion031, NeoTRIP Michelangelo, GeparNuevo, GeparDouze, CamRelief) comprising 3.952 patients were included. ICIs significantly improved EFS (HR = 0.76; 95% CI: 0.65-0.89; p = 0.0005; I2 = 3%) and OS (HR = 0.69; 95% CI: 0.57-0.84; p = 0.0002; I2 = 49%). For pCR, the absolute increase was 8% (RD = 0.08; 95% CI: 0.05-0.11; p < 0.00001; I2 = 0%), and the relative increase was 15% (RR = 1.15; 95% CI: 1.09-1.22; p < 0.00001; I2 = 3%). Notably, OS was not available in NeoTRIP and CamRelief, and EFS was not available in GeparNuevo. Sensitivity analyses (e.g., model selection) confirmed robustness. No evidence of publication bias was detected. Conclusion ICIs combined with chemotherapy significantly improve EFS, OS, and pCR in early-stage TNBC. These data support their incorporation into standard neoadjuvant treatment. Further studies should refine predictive biomarkers and long-term safety monitoring. Citation Format: S. Alexiou, M. Georgios, E. Saloustros. Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors plus chemotherapy in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS4-10-01.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Cancer Research
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps4-10-01
Primary Topic
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract PS4-10-01: Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors plus chemotherapy in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Mangioris Georgios, S. Alexiou, E. Saloustros
Clinical Cancer Research
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
article

Abstract PS4-10-01: Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors plus chemotherapy in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Mangioris Georgios, S. Alexiou, E. Saloustros
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive subtype with limited treatment options and poor prognosis. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown efficacy in the early-stage setting when combined with chemotherapy. We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate their efficacy in terms of event-free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS), and pathological complete response (pCR). Methods We performed a systematic literature search of PubMed, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov to identify randomized controlled trials comparing neoadjuvant or perioperative chemotherapy with or without ICIs in early-stage TNBC. Eligible trials reported on at least one of the following outcomes: EFS, OS, or pCR. Study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment were conducted independently by two reviewers, with discrepancies resolved by consensus. Hazard ratios (HRs) were pooled for EFS and OS using inverse-variance weighting. For pCR, both risk difference (RD) and risk ratio (RR) were calculated using Mantel-Haenszel methods. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic. Pre-specified subgroup and sensitivity analyses were conducted, and publication bias was evaluated via funnel plot asymmetry. The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO (ID: CRD420251082981). Results Six phase II-III trials (KEYNOTE-522, IMpassion031, NeoTRIP Michelangelo, GeparNuevo, GeparDouze, CamRelief) comprising 3.952 patients were included. ICIs significantly improved EFS (HR = 0.76; 95% CI: 0.65-0.89; p = 0.0005; I2 = 3%) and OS (HR = 0.69; 95% CI: 0.57-0.84; p = 0.0002; I2 = 49%). For pCR, the absolute increase was 8% (RD = 0.08; 95% CI: 0.05-0.11; p < 0.00001; I2 = 0%), and the relative increase was 15% (RR = 1.15; 95% CI: 1.09-1.22; p < 0.00001; I2 = 3%). Notably, OS was not available in NeoTRIP and CamRelief, and EFS was not available in GeparNuevo. Sensitivity analyses (e.g., model selection) confirmed robustness. No evidence of publication bias was detected. Conclusion ICIs combined with chemotherapy significantly improve EFS, OS, and pCR in early-stage TNBC. These data support their incorporation into standard neoadjuvant treatment. Further studies should refine predictive biomarkers and long-term safety monitoring. Citation Format: S. Alexiou, M. Georgios, E. Saloustros. Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors plus chemotherapy in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS4-10-01.

Clinical Cancer ResearchVol. 32(4_Supplement)
University Hospital of Larissa (GR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.