Preliminary Validation of the Italian Version of the Artificially Intelligent Device Use Acceptance (AIDUA-IT) Scale: Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation

<b>Background:</b> Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly integrated into healthcare and public services, making user acceptance a key prerequisite for safe and effective implementation. The Artificially Intelligent Device Use Acceptance (AIDUA) model provides a multidimensional framework for evaluating acceptance of intelligent systems, yet no validated Italian instrument is currently available. <b>Objectives:</b> This study aimed to translate, culturally adapt, and preliminarily validate the Italian version of the AIDUA scale (AIDUA-IT) following COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) recommendations. <b>Methods:</b> A two-phase cross-sectional design was used. Phase one included forward-backward translation, expert review (<i>n</i> = 7), and cognitive debriefing (<i>n</i> = 8). Phase two assessed structural validity, internal consistency, convergent and discriminant validity, and short-term test-retest reliability in a convenience sample of Italian-speaking adults (<i>N</i> = 140), with a subsample completing the test-retest assessment (<i>n</i> = 32). <b>Results:</b> The hypothesized eight-factor measurement model demonstrated excellent fit (Comparative Fit Index [CFI] = 0.984; Tucker-Lewis Index [TLI] = 0.981; Root Mean Square Error of Approximation [RMSEA] = 0.041; Standardized Root Mean Square Residual [SRMR] = 0.056), with strong standardized loadings (β range: 0.64-0.96) and good internal consistency (Cronbach's α and McDonald's ω range: 0.82-0.90). Convergent and discriminant validity were supported, and test-retest reliability was good to excellent across subscales (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient [ICC] range: 0.81-0.90). <b>Conclusions:</b> These findings provide initial evidence that the AIDUA-IT is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing acceptance of AI-enabled services in Italy. Further validation in larger and more diverse samples is recommended.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15041578
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Preliminary Validation of the Italian Version of the Artificially Intelligent Device Use Acceptance (AIDUA-IT) Scale: Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation

Honoria Ocagli, Dario Gregori, Giulia Cavasin
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Preliminary Validation of the Italian Version of the Artificially Intelligent Device Use Acceptance (AIDUA-IT) Scale: Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation

Honoria Ocagli, Dario Gregori, Giulia Cavasin
article en

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly integrated into healthcare and public services, making user acceptance a key prerequisite for safe and effective implementation. The Artificially Intelligent Device Use Acceptance (AIDUA) model provides a multidimensional framework for evaluating acceptance of intelligent systems, yet no validated Italian instrument is currently available. <b>Objectives:</b> This study aimed to translate, culturally adapt, and preliminarily validate the Italian version of the AIDUA scale (AIDUA-IT) following COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) recommendations. <b>Methods:</b> A two-phase cross-sectional design was used. Phase one included forward-backward translation, expert review (<i>n</i> = 7), and cognitive debriefing (<i>n</i> = 8). Phase two assessed structural validity, internal consistency, convergent and discriminant validity, and short-term test-retest reliability in a convenience sample of Italian-speaking adults (<i>N</i> = 140), with a subsample completing the test-retest assessment (<i>n</i> = 32). <b>Results:</b> The hypothesized eight-factor measurement model demonstrated excellent fit (Comparative Fit Index [CFI] = 0.984; Tucker-Lewis Index [TLI] = 0.981; Root Mean Square Error of Approximation [RMSEA] = 0.041; Standardized Root Mean Square Residual [SRMR] = 0.056), with strong standardized loadings (β range: 0.64-0.96) and good internal consistency (Cronbach's α and McDonald's ω range: 0.82-0.90). Convergent and discriminant validity were supported, and test-retest reliability was good to excellent across subscales (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient [ICC] range: 0.81-0.90). <b>Conclusions:</b> These findings provide initial evidence that the AIDUA-IT is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing acceptance of AI-enabled services in Italy. Further validation in larger and more diverse samples is recommended.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(4)
University of Padua (IT), AULSS 2 Marca Trevigiana (IT), Ca' Foncello Hospital (IT), Città della Speranza Foundation (IT)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.