Medicine Development and Access for Rare Diseases: Can We Do Better?

Recent advances in molecular biology and genomics have significantly enhanced our understanding of rare diseases. While enabling the development of highly targeted therapies, it also leads to complexity in the development, regulation, and accessibility of orphan medicines. Unmet need and great promise of new medicines, combined with high prices and uncertain effectiveness, highlight the shortcomings of the system, particularly evident for highly specialized treatment options, such as advanced therapy medicinal products and RNA-based treatments. While all stakeholders in this field must take responsibility, academic researchers and clinicians have a vital role which must be strengthened to improve access to and affordability of medicines. Regarding academia-driven orphan medicine development, academic contributions are predominantly concentrated in the early research phases, often lacking continuity throughout the full development pipeline. There is limited expertise in regulatory affairs and market access, and little involvement in medicine pricing or licensing negotiations. Recommendations include sustained academic engagement across all development stages, integration of regulatory and market access training into educational programs, and the implementation of socially responsible frameworks. Strategies promoting the rational use of orphan medicines should be embedded across the entire product lifecycle. Industry-driven development typically interacts primarily with regulatory agencies and payers, with academia playing a reactive and, at times, conflicted role. Independent academic-industry interaction is recommended, with early involvement in clinical trial design. Additionally, academia should proactively contribute to the evaluation of new therapies, development of controlled access models, and exploration of sustainable pricing frameworks. Establishing independent, multi-purpose disease registries would enhance post-authorization monitoring and evidence generation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jimd.70146
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Medicine Development and Access for Rare Diseases: Can We Do Better?

Nina N. Stolwijk, Saco J. de Visser, Vincent van der Wel, Colinda Post et al.
Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
article

Medicine Development and Access for Rare Diseases: Can We Do Better?

Nina N. Stolwijk, Saco J. de Visser, Vincent van der Wel, Colinda Post, Carla E. M. Hollak, Noa Rosenberg, Mirjam Langeveld, Sibren van den Berg, Niels D. Reijnhout, Evert A. Manders, Kathelijn Verdeyen, Roel Jonker, Annet M. Bosch, Daphne Schoenmakers, Bart M. F. Penninx
article en

Abstract

Recent advances in molecular biology and genomics have significantly enhanced our understanding of rare diseases. While enabling the development of highly targeted therapies, it also leads to complexity in the development, regulation, and accessibility of orphan medicines. Unmet need and great promise of new medicines, combined with high prices and uncertain effectiveness, highlight the shortcomings of the system, particularly evident for highly specialized treatment options, such as advanced therapy medicinal products and RNA-based treatments. While all stakeholders in this field must take responsibility, academic researchers and clinicians have a vital role which must be strengthened to improve access to and affordability of medicines. Regarding academia-driven orphan medicine development, academic contributions are predominantly concentrated in the early research phases, often lacking continuity throughout the full development pipeline. There is limited expertise in regulatory affairs and market access, and little involvement in medicine pricing or licensing negotiations. Recommendations include sustained academic engagement across all development stages, integration of regulatory and market access training into educational programs, and the implementation of socially responsible frameworks. Strategies promoting the rational use of orphan medicines should be embedded across the entire product lifecycle. Industry-driven development typically interacts primarily with regulatory agencies and payers, with academia playing a reactive and, at times, conflicted role. Independent academic-industry interaction is recommended, with early involvement in clinical trial design. Additionally, academia should proactively contribute to the evaluation of new therapies, development of controlled access models, and exploration of sustainable pricing frameworks. Establishing independent, multi-purpose disease registries would enhance post-authorization monitoring and evidence generation.

Journal of Inherited Metabolic DiseaseVol. 49(2)
Dutch Cancer Society (NL), Netherlands Center for Occupational Diseases (NL), Emma Kinderziekenhuis (NL), ServiceXS (Netherlands) (NL), Institute for Sustainable Development (ET), Hersenstichting (NL), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Lottery Health Research
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.