Who Gets to Know, Speak, and be Heard? A Scoping Review of Discriminatory Epistemic Injustice (DEI) in Educational Research

There is a lack of a universal definition of inclusion. Researchers have defined the term as being related to inclusion for all, despite race, ethnicity, disability, gender, sexual orientation, language and socioeconomic status. During recent years a new concept has been used in this domain, discriminatory epistemic injustice (DEI). This paper aims to investigate whether this concept may contribute to the definition of inclusion in education. This study’s primary objective was to examine how DEI is apparent within educational contexts, which involves a review of existing educational research for relevant peer-reviewed articles. From this comprehensive search, we carefully selected, reviewed, and analyzed 64 scholarly articles representing diverse global regions. The results of our analysis underscore the widespread prevalence of DEI across diverse educational settings, which means the concept can be related to inclusion in practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nordic Journal of Systematic Reviews in Education
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.23865/njsre.v4.7277
Primary Topic
Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Who Gets to Know, Speak, and be Heard? A Scoping Review of Discriminatory Epistemic Injustice (DEI) in Educational Research

Jörgen Frostlund, Pia Marie Nordgren
Nordic Journal of Systematic Reviews in Education
Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
article

Who Gets to Know, Speak, and be Heard? A Scoping Review of Discriminatory Epistemic Injustice (DEI) in Educational Research

Jörgen Frostlund, Pia Marie Nordgren
article en

Abstract

There is a lack of a universal definition of inclusion. Researchers have defined the term as being related to inclusion for all, despite race, ethnicity, disability, gender, sexual orientation, language and socioeconomic status. During recent years a new concept has been used in this domain, discriminatory epistemic injustice (DEI). This paper aims to investigate whether this concept may contribute to the definition of inclusion in education. This study’s primary objective was to examine how DEI is apparent within educational contexts, which involves a review of existing educational research for relevant peer-reviewed articles. From this comprehensive search, we carefully selected, reviewed, and analyzed 64 scholarly articles representing diverse global regions. The results of our analysis underscore the widespread prevalence of DEI across diverse educational settings, which means the concept can be related to inclusion in practice.

Nordic Journal of Systematic Reviews in EducationVol. 4
University of Borås (SE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.