Comparing Acute Effects of Caffeine Delivery Forms on Cross-Training Performance: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Crossover Trial
<b>Background/Objectives</b>: The aim of this study was to compare the different forms of caffeine (CAF) administration in CrossFit<sup>®</sup> participants. The countermovement jump (CMJ), the rate of perceived exertion (RPE), the total number of repetitions, and the maximum (HR<sub>max</sub>) and mean heart rate (HR<sub>mean</sub>) were evaluated. <b>Methods</b>: Fourteen males with more than six months of continuous CrossFit<sup>®</sup> training (30.9 [5.62] years, 179 [1.33] cm, 78 [5.75] kg, 24.3 [1.33] kg·m<sup>-2</sup>) participated in this randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study. Participants were randomized in a repeated measures design using caffeine capsule (CC), caffeine chewing gum (CCG), and caffeine mouth rinse (CMR) protocols, along with a placebo group (PG). Participants were unaware of whether any of the delivery methods contained caffeine. A 7-day washout period before each crossover was used. To ensure ecological validity, we replicated the real-world practice of CAF ingestion 30 min prior to training, mirroring typical athlete pre-workout routines. The participants of CrossFit<sup>®</sup> performed the 'Cindy' protocol, and the CMJ as a primary outcome was measured pre- and post-intervention, while the RPE, HR, and the number of repetitions were tracked at the end of the workout for comparisons. <b>Results</b>: No significant differences were found between CAF forms in internal load measures (RPE, HR<sub>max</sub>, HR<sub>mean</sub>) or the number of repetitions. While no changes were observed with other CAF forms, CMR significantly improved the CMJ performance compared to the baseline (Δ: +3.5; Cohen's d<sub>unb</sub>: 0.51], which exceeded the estimated SWC by approximately three-fold. However, the inferential analysis revealed no significant main effects of the caffeine administration method on any measured outcomes. <b>Conclusions</b>: While CAF delivery forms did not improve internal load measures or performance parameters, such as the RPE, HR, or the total number of repetitions, the caffeine mouth rinse (CMR) showed a potentially meaningful improvement in CMJ performance after CrossFit<sup>®</sup> training in participants with a certain level of experience.
Authors
- Salvador Vargas-Molina (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6775-9159)
- Mora Murri (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6482-192X)
- Fernando Martín (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1996-8276)
- Manuel García-Sillero (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3022-9151)
- Javier Benitez-Porres
- Diego A. Bonilla
- Sergio Iglesias-Placed
Institutions
- Universitat de València (ES)
- University of the Basque Country (ES)
- Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ES)
- Spanish Biomedical Research Centre in Physiopathology of Obesity and Nutrition (ES)
- Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga (ES)
- Dynamic Systems (United States) (US)
- Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Victoria (ES)
- Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga (ES)
- Universidad de Málaga (ES)
- University of Wales Trinity Saint David (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Nutrients
- Published
- 2026-02-17
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/nu18040657
- Primary Topic
- Coffee research and impacts
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00