Abstract PS2-06-17: Olaparib Use and gBRCA Testing among HER2-Negative Early-Stage Breast Cancer Patients in the United States Community Oncology Setting

Abstract Background: Long-term follow-up of the OlympiA trial confirmed the efficacy and safety of olaparib among high-risk HER2-negative (HER2-) early breast cancer (eBC) patients with a germline BRCA (gBRCA) mutation. This retrospective study focused on olaparib users and aimed to describe the contemporary real-world landscape for HER2- patients in the community oncology setting with regard to biomarker testing, treatment patterns, and olaparib uptake. Methods: Electronic medical record data from The US Oncology Network were used for this retrospective study among adult HER2- eBC patients who initiated systemic adjuvant treatment between 01 Jan 2020 - 31 Oct 2024 (adjuvant treatment initiation date as index date). Patient selection was conducted in a stepwise method, prioritizing patients who initiated olaparib, followed by non-olaparib patients who received BRCA and genomic risk testing (ODX or Mammaprint), followed by non-olaparib patients with a high genomic risk score (defined as ODX≥25 or High Mammaprint result). Patient and treatment characteristics, including biomarker and testing patterns, were assessed descriptively. Results: There were 251 HER2- eBC patients considered eligible for the study (222 HR+, 27 TNBC, 2 HR untested). Overall, 216 (97.3%) HR+ patients had a high genomic risk score, 42 (16.7%) patients had a gBRCA mutation, and 34 (13.5%) initiated olaparib. The median (IQR) time from gBRCA result date to olaparib initiation date was 8.8 (1.0, 23.1) months. gBRCA testing rates varied by biomarker status, with 64.4% (n=143) of HR+ patients and 85.2% (n=23) of TNBC patients tested. Overall, 34% (n=85) of patients did not receive gBRCA testing, and 12% (n=19) of patients received gBRCA testing after adjuvant therapy initiation. Compared to the overall cohort, olaparib users were younger (46.7 vs. 55.3 years), were more likely to have a family history of cancer (91.2 vs. 81.7%), and had a higher proportion of TNBC patients (47.1 vs.10.8%). Conclusion: Despite utilizing patient selection methods that prioritized olaparib users as well as patients tested for BRCA and genomic risk, olaparib uptake in the real-world is limited among HER2- eBC patients. Eligibility for olaparib is dependent upon having a BRCA mutation, but findings show that one-third of patients, especially among HR+ patients, did not receive gBRCA testing. Current guidelines recommend gBRCA testing for all patients with breast cancer, and as a result, there is an opportunity to improve gBRCA testing rates and timing to identify additional patients who may be eligible for and benefit from targeted treatment such as olaparib. As olaparib uptake increases, ongoing research to describe clinical outcomes is recommended. Citation Format: K. Mishkin, M. Ru, M. Mabel Mardones, I. Sruti, J. Murphy, J. Guo, Q. Li, X. Xu, K. Hirschfield, J. A. Mejia, P. Conkling. Olaparib Use and gBRCA Testing among HER2-Negative Early-Stage Breast Cancer Patients in the United States Community Oncology Setting [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS2-06-17.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Cancer Research
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps2-06-17
Primary Topic
PARP inhibition in cancer therapy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract PS2-06-17: Olaparib Use and gBRCA Testing among HER2-Negative Early-Stage Breast Cancer Patients in the United States Community Oncology Setting

John Murphy, I. Sruti, K. Mishkin, J. Guo et al.
Clinical Cancer Research
PARP inhibition in cancer therapy
article

Abstract PS2-06-17: Olaparib Use and gBRCA Testing among HER2-Negative Early-Stage Breast Cancer Patients in the United States Community Oncology Setting

John Murphy, I. Sruti, K. Mishkin, J. Guo, Q. Li, K. Hirschfield, M. Mabel Mardones, X. Xu, M. Ru, P. Conkling, J. A. Mejia
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: Long-term follow-up of the OlympiA trial confirmed the efficacy and safety of olaparib among high-risk HER2-negative (HER2-) early breast cancer (eBC) patients with a germline BRCA (gBRCA) mutation. This retrospective study focused on olaparib users and aimed to describe the contemporary real-world landscape for HER2- patients in the community oncology setting with regard to biomarker testing, treatment patterns, and olaparib uptake. Methods: Electronic medical record data from The US Oncology Network were used for this retrospective study among adult HER2- eBC patients who initiated systemic adjuvant treatment between 01 Jan 2020 - 31 Oct 2024 (adjuvant treatment initiation date as index date). Patient selection was conducted in a stepwise method, prioritizing patients who initiated olaparib, followed by non-olaparib patients who received BRCA and genomic risk testing (ODX or Mammaprint), followed by non-olaparib patients with a high genomic risk score (defined as ODX≥25 or High Mammaprint result). Patient and treatment characteristics, including biomarker and testing patterns, were assessed descriptively. Results: There were 251 HER2- eBC patients considered eligible for the study (222 HR+, 27 TNBC, 2 HR untested). Overall, 216 (97.3%) HR+ patients had a high genomic risk score, 42 (16.7%) patients had a gBRCA mutation, and 34 (13.5%) initiated olaparib. The median (IQR) time from gBRCA result date to olaparib initiation date was 8.8 (1.0, 23.1) months. gBRCA testing rates varied by biomarker status, with 64.4% (n=143) of HR+ patients and 85.2% (n=23) of TNBC patients tested. Overall, 34% (n=85) of patients did not receive gBRCA testing, and 12% (n=19) of patients received gBRCA testing after adjuvant therapy initiation. Compared to the overall cohort, olaparib users were younger (46.7 vs. 55.3 years), were more likely to have a family history of cancer (91.2 vs. 81.7%), and had a higher proportion of TNBC patients (47.1 vs.10.8%). Conclusion: Despite utilizing patient selection methods that prioritized olaparib users as well as patients tested for BRCA and genomic risk, olaparib uptake in the real-world is limited among HER2- eBC patients. Eligibility for olaparib is dependent upon having a BRCA mutation, but findings show that one-third of patients, especially among HR+ patients, did not receive gBRCA testing. Current guidelines recommend gBRCA testing for all patients with breast cancer, and as a result, there is an opportunity to improve gBRCA testing rates and timing to identify additional patients who may be eligible for and benefit from targeted treatment such as olaparib. As olaparib uptake increases, ongoing research to describe clinical outcomes is recommended. Citation Format: K. Mishkin, M. Ru, M. Mabel Mardones, I. Sruti, J. Murphy, J. Guo, Q. Li, X. Xu, K. Hirschfield, J. A. Mejia, P. Conkling. Olaparib Use and gBRCA Testing among HER2-Negative Early-Stage Breast Cancer Patients in the United States Community Oncology Setting [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS2-06-17.

Clinical Cancer ResearchVol. 32(4_Supplement)
AstraZeneca (United Kingdom) (GB), EADA Business School (ES), Merck Institute for Science Education (US), Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
PARP inhibition in cancer therapy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.