Pain management of adults in the prehospital setting: a scoping review

The most effective treatment for pain in prehospital adults remains uncertain. This scoping review aimed to descriptively synthesize the evidence and identify research gaps regarding pain interventions for adults in prehospital settings. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, and TRIP on 11 April 2025. Systematic reviews of adults receiving a pain intervention in the prehospital setting were included. We defined prehospital pain in this review as adults (18 years or >) treated for pain by a healthcare professional in the out-of-hospital setting from the time of first contact at the scene until emergency department admission. AMSTAR 2 was used to assess quality. There were 22 systematic reviews (n = 193 primary studies, n = 93,092 adults) included that assessed 24 interventions including fentanyl (n = 9 reviews, 41%), ketamine (n = 9, 41%), morphine (n = 7, 32%), ketamine plus morphine (n = 7, 32%), fascia iliaca nerve block (n = 5, 23%), methoxyflurane (n = 5, 23%), nitrous oxide (n = 5, 23%), sufentanil (n = 4, 18%), tramadol (n = 4, 18%), paracetamol (n = 3, 14%), alfentanil (n = 2, 9%), femoral nerve block (n = 2, 9%), ibuprofen (n = 2, 9%), pentazocine (n = 2, 9%), transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (n = 2, 9%), auricular acupressure (n = 1, 5%), butorphanol (n = 1, 5%), hydromorphone (n = 1, 5%), ketamine plus nitrous oxide (n = 1, 5%), meperidine (n = 1, 5%), metamizole (n = 1, 5%), papaveretum (n = 1, 5%), and traction/splinting (n = 1, 5%). A third (38%; n = 8) of reviews conducted meta-analyses; median = 876 participants (IQR: 320–1538). However, no meta-analyses met the threshold of 5126 participants deemed necessary following trial sequence analysis. The quality of reviews was high (n = 8, 36%), moderate (n = 9, 41%), low (n = 2, 9%), and critically low (n = 3, 14%). Larger pragmatic trials using a single validated pain scale with interventions administered at standardized time intervals are required to facilitate evidence synthesis and evidence-based decision-making for pain management in prehospital settings. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/MH7Q9 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Emergency Medicine
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-026-01491-1
Primary Topic
Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pain management of adults in the prehospital setting: a scoping review

Georgia Catherine Richards, Dor Vadas, Carl J Heneghan, James M. Burgert
BMC Emergency Medicine
Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
article

Pain management of adults in the prehospital setting: a scoping review

Georgia Catherine Richards, Dor Vadas, Carl J Heneghan, James M. Burgert
article en

Abstract

The most effective treatment for pain in prehospital adults remains uncertain. This scoping review aimed to descriptively synthesize the evidence and identify research gaps regarding pain interventions for adults in prehospital settings. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, and TRIP on 11 April 2025. Systematic reviews of adults receiving a pain intervention in the prehospital setting were included. We defined prehospital pain in this review as adults (18 years or >) treated for pain by a healthcare professional in the out-of-hospital setting from the time of first contact at the scene until emergency department admission. AMSTAR 2 was used to assess quality. There were 22 systematic reviews (n = 193 primary studies, n = 93,092 adults) included that assessed 24 interventions including fentanyl (n = 9 reviews, 41%), ketamine (n = 9, 41%), morphine (n = 7, 32%), ketamine plus morphine (n = 7, 32%), fascia iliaca nerve block (n = 5, 23%), methoxyflurane (n = 5, 23%), nitrous oxide (n = 5, 23%), sufentanil (n = 4, 18%), tramadol (n = 4, 18%), paracetamol (n = 3, 14%), alfentanil (n = 2, 9%), femoral nerve block (n = 2, 9%), ibuprofen (n = 2, 9%), pentazocine (n = 2, 9%), transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (n = 2, 9%), auricular acupressure (n = 1, 5%), butorphanol (n = 1, 5%), hydromorphone (n = 1, 5%), ketamine plus nitrous oxide (n = 1, 5%), meperidine (n = 1, 5%), metamizole (n = 1, 5%), papaveretum (n = 1, 5%), and traction/splinting (n = 1, 5%). A third (38%; n = 8) of reviews conducted meta-analyses; median = 876 participants (IQR: 320–1538). However, no meta-analyses met the threshold of 5126 participants deemed necessary following trial sequence analysis. The quality of reviews was high (n = 8, 36%), moderate (n = 9, 41%), low (n = 2, 9%), and critically low (n = 3, 14%). Larger pragmatic trials using a single validated pain scale with interventions administered at standardized time intervals are required to facilitate evidence synthesis and evidence-based decision-making for pain management in prehospital settings. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/MH7Q9 .

BMC Emergency MedicineVol. 26(1)
King's College London (GB), John Radcliffe Hospital (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.