Conducting process evaluations of WASH interventions: a scoping review of design approaches and indicators in low- and middle-income countries

Process evaluation is increasingly used to strengthen the design and delivery of WASH interventions, yet variation persists in how implementation is defined, measured, and reported. More intentional application of frameworks and structured reporting can enhance the clarity and comparability of implementation assessments, including more systematic approaches for describing context. By consolidating quantitative and qualitative indicators and the data types used to measure them across 6 domains, this review provides a foundation to support more transparent, standardized, and framework-guided process evaluations that can strengthen learning, adaptation, and implementation practices in the WASH sector.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Implementation Science Communications
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-026-00872-8
Primary Topic
Child Nutrition and Water Access
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Conducting process evaluations of WASH interventions: a scoping review of design approaches and indicators in low- and middle-income countries

Florence Santos, Emily Awino Ogutu, Jedidiah S. Snyder, Lilly A O’Brien et al.
Implementation Science Communications
Child Nutrition and Water Access
article

Conducting process evaluations of WASH interventions: a scoping review of design approaches and indicators in low- and middle-income countries

Florence Santos, Emily Awino Ogutu, Jedidiah S. Snyder, Lilly A O’Brien, Sara A. Hoffman, Paul Roman C. Bagtas, Erika Canda, Erin E. Reardon, Matthew C. Freeman
article en

Abstract

Process evaluation is increasingly used to strengthen the design and delivery of WASH interventions, yet variation persists in how implementation is defined, measured, and reported. More intentional application of frameworks and structured reporting can enhance the clarity and comparability of implementation assessments, including more systematic approaches for describing context. By consolidating quantitative and qualitative indicators and the data types used to measure them across 6 domains, this review provides a foundation to support more transparent, standardized, and framework-guided process evaluations that can strengthen learning, adaptation, and implementation practices in the WASH sector.

Implementation Science CommunicationsVol. 7(1)
CARE USA (US), Emory University (US), Woodruff Health Sciences Center (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Child Nutrition and Water Access
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Conducting process evaluations of WASH interventions: a scoping review of design approaches and indicators in low- and middle-income countries — Florence Santos, Emily Awino Ogutu, et al. · Implementation Science Communications (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS