Using think aloud with female adolescents to validate psychological well- and ill-being self-report measures

Many existing measures of psychological well- and ill-being are used with young people without testing contemporary adolescent understanding of them. The purpose of this study was to use think aloud interviews to test adolescent understanding of three existing, and one newly created psychological well- or ill-being measures. An initial sample of 40 female participants aged 13-14 years took part in the study. Problematic items were identified based on thematic analysis of adolescent feedback. One item of the Lethargy Scale and one item of the Subjective Vitality Scale were adapted following integration of think aloud findings. The results also indicated that the Brief Serenity Scale was unsuitable for the participants. Subsequently, a second sample of 57 female participants aged 13-14 years completed the think aloud protocol with an alternative measure of serenity, the Child Serenity Scale, and thematic analysis revealed no items were problematic. A 24-item psychological well- and ill-being self-report measure was consequently proposed for use in future research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLOS mental health.
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmen.0000551
Primary Topic
Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using think aloud with female adolescents to validate psychological well- and ill-being self-report measures

Haridhan Goswami, Paul R. Appleton, Rebbeca M. Pearson, Sophie C. M. Chatwin
PLOS mental health.
Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
article

Using think aloud with female adolescents to validate psychological well- and ill-being self-report measures

Haridhan Goswami, Paul R. Appleton, Rebbeca M. Pearson, Sophie C. M. Chatwin
article en

Abstract

Many existing measures of psychological well- and ill-being are used with young people without testing contemporary adolescent understanding of them. The purpose of this study was to use think aloud interviews to test adolescent understanding of three existing, and one newly created psychological well- or ill-being measures. An initial sample of 40 female participants aged 13-14 years took part in the study. Problematic items were identified based on thematic analysis of adolescent feedback. One item of the Lethargy Scale and one item of the Subjective Vitality Scale were adapted following integration of think aloud findings. The results also indicated that the Brief Serenity Scale was unsuitable for the participants. Subsequently, a second sample of 57 female participants aged 13-14 years completed the think aloud protocol with an alternative measure of serenity, the Child Serenity Scale, and thematic analysis revealed no items were problematic. A 24-item psychological well- and ill-being self-report measure was consequently proposed for use in future research.

PLOS mental health.Vol. 3(2)
Manchester Metropolitan University (GB)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Using think aloud with female adolescents to validate psychological well- and ill-being self-report measures — Haridhan Goswami, Paul R. Appleton, et al. · PLOS mental health. (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS