Responsible use of artificial intelligence in the provision of long-term care for older people: a care-centric approach

Current approaches to the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in the provision of long-term care for older people are largely framed around solving perceived problems in the sector, such as managing workforce shortages by driving greater efficiency through the automation of administrative and care tasks. Although such approaches might highlight some benefits of AI, they tend to overlook broader contextual and ethical implications within the complex structures of care systems. Thus, such narrow approaches can compromise care quality and pose risks for care recipients, caregivers, and care services. In this Personal View, we advocate for an alternative, care-centric approach to AI in long-term care, grounded in co-production and rooted in the view that care is a human need tied to wellbeing, dignity, equality, and human rights. We propose a definition of the responsible use of AI in long-term care with values of care at the forefront. We propose to use this definition as a starting point to drive AI policy and practice, rather than focusing on perceived problems, while also acknowledging and addressing tensions identified during the recent co-creation of responsible AI guidelines for the UK.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Lancet Healthy Longevity
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanhl.2026.100817
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Responsible use of artificial intelligence in the provision of long-term care for older people: a care-centric approach

Tyler Reinmund, Kate Hamblin, Caroline Emmer De Albuquerque Green, Samir K Sinha
The Lancet Healthy Longevity
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Responsible use of artificial intelligence in the provision of long-term care for older people: a care-centric approach

Tyler Reinmund, Kate Hamblin, Caroline Emmer De Albuquerque Green, Samir K Sinha
article en

Abstract

Current approaches to the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in the provision of long-term care for older people are largely framed around solving perceived problems in the sector, such as managing workforce shortages by driving greater efficiency through the automation of administrative and care tasks. Although such approaches might highlight some benefits of AI, they tend to overlook broader contextual and ethical implications within the complex structures of care systems. Thus, such narrow approaches can compromise care quality and pose risks for care recipients, caregivers, and care services. In this Personal View, we advocate for an alternative, care-centric approach to AI in long-term care, grounded in co-production and rooted in the view that care is a human need tied to wellbeing, dignity, equality, and human rights. We propose a definition of the responsible use of AI in long-term care with values of care at the forefront. We propose to use this definition as a starting point to drive AI policy and practice, rather than focusing on perceived problems, while also acknowledging and addressing tensions identified during the recent co-creation of responsible AI guidelines for the UK.

The Lancet Healthy LongevityVol. 7(2)
University of Toronto (CA), University of Oxford (GB), Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities (GB), Sheffield Hallam University (GB)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.