Insomnia among healthcare professionals during and after the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Abstract During the COVID-19 pandemic, a significant impairment of sleep quality has been observed among healthcare professionals. This meta-analysis aimed to examine the global prevalence and severity of insomnia among healthcare workers during the acute phase of the pandemic and into the post-pandemic period. A systematic search of electronic databases and citation tracking identified 34 studies that met the inclusion criteria. Pooled prevalence and severity were calculated using a random-effects model. The influence of potential moderator variables was evaluated using subgroup analyses and meta-regressions. The estimated pooled prevalence of insomnia among healthcare workers was 43.5% (95% CI: 35.4%–51.9%). The pooled severity scores exceeded the clinical threshold for insomnia across all outcome measures. The multiple meta-regression model identified measurement instrument, geographical location, and response rate as significant predictors of prevalence estimates. The high rates of insomnia identified in this study highlight the need for targeted psychological support for healthcare professionals. Variability in prevalence estimates appears to be influenced by methodological factors as well as cultural and contextual differences. These findings underscore the importance of standardizing assessment tools and considering regional and cultural factors when designing mental health interventions and interpreting epidemiological data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Psychology
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-026-09091-9
Primary Topic
COVID-19 and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Insomnia among healthcare professionals during and after the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Josefa A. Antón-Ruiz, Agata Horyza, Marina Iniesta-Sepúlveda
Current Psychology
COVID-19 and Mental Health
article

Insomnia among healthcare professionals during and after the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Josefa A. Antón-Ruiz, Agata Horyza, Marina Iniesta-Sepúlveda
article en

Abstract

Abstract During the COVID-19 pandemic, a significant impairment of sleep quality has been observed among healthcare professionals. This meta-analysis aimed to examine the global prevalence and severity of insomnia among healthcare workers during the acute phase of the pandemic and into the post-pandemic period. A systematic search of electronic databases and citation tracking identified 34 studies that met the inclusion criteria. Pooled prevalence and severity were calculated using a random-effects model. The influence of potential moderator variables was evaluated using subgroup analyses and meta-regressions. The estimated pooled prevalence of insomnia among healthcare workers was 43.5% (95% CI: 35.4%–51.9%). The pooled severity scores exceeded the clinical threshold for insomnia across all outcome measures. The multiple meta-regression model identified measurement instrument, geographical location, and response rate as significant predictors of prevalence estimates. The high rates of insomnia identified in this study highlight the need for targeted psychological support for healthcare professionals. Variability in prevalence estimates appears to be influenced by methodological factors as well as cultural and contextual differences. These findings underscore the importance of standardizing assessment tools and considering regional and cultural factors when designing mental health interventions and interpreting epidemiological data.

Current PsychologyVol. 45(5)
University of Alicante (ES), Universidad Católica de Murcia (ES)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
COVID-19 and Mental Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.