Review of automated parallel test form assembly

This paper presents a review of advanced automated parallel test form assembly (ATA) methods for computer-based testing (CBT) using artificial intelligence approaches. Parallel test forms ensure equivalent measurement accuracy of examinees’ scores across different sets of question items and thereby enable assessments to be administered at any time and from any location. First, this paper presents a review of ATA methods, organizing them into four categories: Mixed-Integer Programming (MIP), multi-form MIP, metaheuristics, and form-maximization. Second, this paper describes a comparison of the characteristics of these methods in terms of measurement accuracy, accessibility, computational complexity, and feasible testing frequency. Moreover, based on these characteristics, the review presents an example decision framework for selecting ATA methods according to the requirements of CBT. Finally, numerical experiments were conducted for this study to compare representative ATA methods in terms of their relative strengths and weaknesses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Behaviormetrika
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s41237-026-00293-w
Primary Topic
VLSI and Analog Circuit Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Review of automated parallel test form assembly

Pokpong Songmuang, Kazuma Fuchimoto
Behaviormetrika
VLSI and Analog Circuit Testing
article

Review of automated parallel test form assembly

Pokpong Songmuang, Kazuma Fuchimoto
article en

Abstract

This paper presents a review of advanced automated parallel test form assembly (ATA) methods for computer-based testing (CBT) using artificial intelligence approaches. Parallel test forms ensure equivalent measurement accuracy of examinees’ scores across different sets of question items and thereby enable assessments to be administered at any time and from any location. First, this paper presents a review of ATA methods, organizing them into four categories: Mixed-Integer Programming (MIP), multi-form MIP, metaheuristics, and form-maximization. Second, this paper describes a comparison of the characteristics of these methods in terms of measurement accuracy, accessibility, computational complexity, and feasible testing frequency. Moreover, based on these characteristics, the review presents an example decision framework for selecting ATA methods according to the requirements of CBT. Finally, numerical experiments were conducted for this study to compare representative ATA methods in terms of their relative strengths and weaknesses.

Behaviormetrika
Thammasat University (TH), National Center for University Entrance Examinations (JP)
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
VLSI and Analog Circuit Testing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Review of automated parallel test form assembly — Pokpong Songmuang, Kazuma Fuchimoto · Behaviormetrika (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS