Knee height is often right: evaluating device height effects on camera trapping rate

Abstract Camera traps (CTs) are widely used in wildlife monitoring, but sampling design choices can introduce significant biases in trapping rates (TR) that, depending on the evaluated parameter, can be propagated to dependent estimates (e.g., density). This study evaluates the effect of camera height placement on TR across five experiments encompassing 172 paired sampling points (i.e., with a low and a high camera per point) in four biomes across Europe, North America and Africa. We analysed data of 49 vertebrate species, ranging from small mammals and birds to large ungulates and carnivores (0.013–461 kg), using generalised linear and multinomial models to assess how TR varies with body mass and camera height. Our results show that lower camera placements significantly increase TR for small (0–10 kg) and medium‐sized species (11–50 kg), while the opposite is found in larger animals. Simultaneous detections by both high‐ and low‐placed cameras increased with body mass, but small species were often missed by high cameras alone. Camera height introduces systematic biases in TR, affecting its comparability across time and space. For multispecies monitoring, lower cameras (30–50 cm above ground) offer better overall performance, though higher placements may be more suitable for large‐bodied focal species. We recommend consistent, standardised height measurements in long‐term monitoring to ensure reliable TR‐based inferences and validate the recommendation of using target species' shoulder height when monitoring single species. This study provides the most comprehensive cross‐continental evaluation of camera height effects to date and offers empirically grounded guidance for optimising sampling design in wildlife monitoring.