Re‐evaluation of sucralose (E 955) as a food additive and evaluation of a new application on extension of use of sucralose (E 955) in fine bakery wares

The present opinion deals with the re-evaluation of sucralose (E 955) as food additive and with the safety of a proposed extension of use in food category (FC) 7.2 'Fine bakery wares'. Based on the available data, no safety concerns arose for genotoxicity of sucralose (E 955) and its impurities and degradation products. Based on the weight of evidence (WoE), the Panel considered the decrease in body weight observed in rats as the relevant endpoint for the derivation of a reference point (RP). The Panel performed a benchmark dose (BMD) analysis on the data from the longest study (combined chronic and carcinogenicity study) with a modified benchmark dose response to account for the poor palatability of sucralose. The resulting RP was 55 mg/kg bw per day (benchmark dose lower confidence limit; BMDL). The Panel considered it appropriate to derive chemical-specific assessment factor for sucralose and concluded that there is no need to revise the current ADI of 15 mg/kg bw per day of sucralose (E 955) previously established by the Scientific Committee on Food. The exposure estimates considering the currently authorised uses did not exceed the ADI. Therefore, the Panel concluded that there is no safety concern at the reported uses and use levels of sucralose (E 955). The overall exposure did not increase substantially when considering the proposed extension of use. However, based on the available data and the identified uncertainties regarding the potential formation of chlorinated compounds under the wide range of baking processes that may be applicable for FC 7.2, the Panel could not conclude on the safety of the proposed extension of use of E 955 in this FC. The Panel issued recommendations to the European Commission, primarily to consider a revision of the EU specifications for sucralose.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
EFSA Journal
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2026.9854
Primary Topic
Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Re‐evaluation of sucralose (E 955) as a food additive and evaluation of a new application on extension of use of sucralose (E 955) in fine bakery wares

Manuela Mirat, Sara Levorato, Reginald B. Fitzgerald, Zsuzsanna H. Horváth et al.
EFSA Journal
Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
article

Re‐evaluation of sucralose (E 955) as a food additive and evaluation of a new application on extension of use of sucralose (E 955) in fine bakery wares

Manuela Mirat, Sara Levorato, Reginald B. Fitzgerald, Zsuzsanna H. Horváth, James Kevin Chipman, Elena Mazzoli, Federica Lodi, Alexandra Tard, Polly Boon, Maria Jose Frutos Fernandez, Thorhallur Halldorsson, Peter Fürst, Monica Andreassen, Ursula Gundert‐Remy, Laurence Castle, Monika Batke, Biagio Fallico, Henriqueta Louro, Patricia Morales, Antonios Dourus, Sabina Passamonti, Bettina Grasl‐Kraupp, Marcin Kurek, Matthew Wright, Maria Lourdes Bastos, EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF), Josef Daniel Rasinger, Consuelo Civitella, Riccardo Crebelli, Alicja Mortensen, Eric Houdeau, Gabriele Aquilina, Rainer Gürtler, Stefania Barmaz, Ana Maria Rincon
article en

Abstract

The present opinion deals with the re-evaluation of sucralose (E 955) as food additive and with the safety of a proposed extension of use in food category (FC) 7.2 'Fine bakery wares'. Based on the available data, no safety concerns arose for genotoxicity of sucralose (E 955) and its impurities and degradation products. Based on the weight of evidence (WoE), the Panel considered the decrease in body weight observed in rats as the relevant endpoint for the derivation of a reference point (RP). The Panel performed a benchmark dose (BMD) analysis on the data from the longest study (combined chronic and carcinogenicity study) with a modified benchmark dose response to account for the poor palatability of sucralose. The resulting RP was 55 mg/kg bw per day (benchmark dose lower confidence limit; BMDL). The Panel considered it appropriate to derive chemical-specific assessment factor for sucralose and concluded that there is no need to revise the current ADI of 15 mg/kg bw per day of sucralose (E 955) previously established by the Scientific Committee on Food. The exposure estimates considering the currently authorised uses did not exceed the ADI. Therefore, the Panel concluded that there is no safety concern at the reported uses and use levels of sucralose (E 955). The overall exposure did not increase substantially when considering the proposed extension of use. However, based on the available data and the identified uncertainties regarding the potential formation of chlorinated compounds under the wide range of baking processes that may be applicable for FC 7.2, the Panel could not conclude on the safety of the proposed extension of use of E 955 in this FC. The Panel issued recommendations to the European Commission, primarily to consider a revision of the EU specifications for sucralose.

EFSA JournalVol. 24(2)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.