Abstract PS1-13-30: Concordance of Mammographic Studies Between Artificial Intelligence and Expert Breast Radiologists

Abstract Background. Various artificial intelligence (AI) programs have been specifically designed and trained for breast cancer screening and prediction, and their use is steadily increasing. However, tools such as ChatGPT—an AI not originally developed for imaging analysis—are being increasingly employed for this purpose, particularly by non-medical personnel. This situation may generate mistrust and uncertainty among patients when comparing AI-generated reports with those of medical specialists. Therefore, the proper use of these tools requires awareness of their intended scope and limitations. Methods. Random mammograms performed in August 2025 on asymptomatic women undergoing preventive screening were included. All studies were interpreted and reported by expert breast radiologists. For AI evaluation, images were uploaded using an iPhone 16 Pro Max into ChatGPT, which generated a structured mammography report. Concordance was assessed across three parameters: breast density, BI-RADS classification, and recommendations. Results A total of 50 mammograms met the inclusion criteria. Concordance for breast density was 88%, with a predominance of pattern C in 65% of cases. BI-RADS classification showed 93% concordance, most commonly BI-RADS 2. Recommendations demonstrated 90% concordance, particularly regarding complementary breast ultrasound and annual follow-up when clinically indicated. Conclusions. Our findings suggest that ChatGPT, despite not being specifically designed for imaging interpretation, demonstrated a high level of concordance with expert breast radiologists. These results should be confirmed in larger case series to validate the potential role of non-imaging AI tools in breast cancer screening support. Citation Format: R. S. LIMON. Concordance of Mammographic Studies Between Artificial Intelligence and Expert Breast Radiologists [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS1-13-30.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Cancer Research
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps1-13-30
Primary Topic
AI in cancer detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract PS1-13-30: Concordance of Mammographic Studies Between Artificial Intelligence and Expert Breast Radiologists

R. S. LIMON
Clinical Cancer Research
AI in cancer detection
article

Abstract PS1-13-30: Concordance of Mammographic Studies Between Artificial Intelligence and Expert Breast Radiologists

R. S. LIMON
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background. Various artificial intelligence (AI) programs have been specifically designed and trained for breast cancer screening and prediction, and their use is steadily increasing. However, tools such as ChatGPT—an AI not originally developed for imaging analysis—are being increasingly employed for this purpose, particularly by non-medical personnel. This situation may generate mistrust and uncertainty among patients when comparing AI-generated reports with those of medical specialists. Therefore, the proper use of these tools requires awareness of their intended scope and limitations. Methods. Random mammograms performed in August 2025 on asymptomatic women undergoing preventive screening were included. All studies were interpreted and reported by expert breast radiologists. For AI evaluation, images were uploaded using an iPhone 16 Pro Max into ChatGPT, which generated a structured mammography report. Concordance was assessed across three parameters: breast density, BI-RADS classification, and recommendations. Results A total of 50 mammograms met the inclusion criteria. Concordance for breast density was 88%, with a predominance of pattern C in 65% of cases. BI-RADS classification showed 93% concordance, most commonly BI-RADS 2. Recommendations demonstrated 90% concordance, particularly regarding complementary breast ultrasound and annual follow-up when clinically indicated. Conclusions. Our findings suggest that ChatGPT, despite not being specifically designed for imaging interpretation, demonstrated a high level of concordance with expert breast radiologists. These results should be confirmed in larger case series to validate the potential role of non-imaging AI tools in breast cancer screening support. Citation Format: R. S. LIMON. Concordance of Mammographic Studies Between Artificial Intelligence and Expert Breast Radiologists [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS1-13-30.

Clinical Cancer ResearchVol. 32(4_Supplement)
Nur University (BO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
AI in cancer detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.