Abstract PS5-07-08: CDK4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) dosing knowledge (CDK) study: A pragmatic randomized trial of indicated vs. titrated CDK4/6i dosing in older adults with HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (MBC)

Abstract Background Many cancer drugs have been FDA approved based on a drug development paradigm using a maximum tolerated dose (MTD) approach. For targeted anticancer agents, including CDK4/6is, the MTD approach is less relevant, as the optimal biological dose may be lower than the MTD. CDK4/6is are commonly combined with endocrine therapy (ET) for treatment (tx) of HR+/HER2- MBC. Clinical trials and real-world data show that CDK4/6is are commonly dose-reduced to manage side effects and improve tolerability, without loss of efficacy. Benefits of CDK4/6i therapy are similar in younger and older patients (pts); however, toxicity can be worse in older pts leading to more dose reductions, tx interruptions, and discontinuations. We hypothesize that titrated dosing (i.e., initiating tx at lower doses and escalating as tolerated) may enable older pts to remain on tx longer with fewer adverse events (AEs). The CDK Study (NCT06377852), a multicenter, pragmatic, randomized trial, was developed to determine if titrated dosing of palbociclib (P) or ribociclib (R) in pts aged ≥65 years with HR+/HER2- MBC would allow pts to stay on tx longer than the standard FDA-approved indicated dosing approach. This study is funded through a Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) Award (BPS-2022C3-26451). Trial Design For CDK4/6i dosing, pts are randomized 1:1 to: Arm 1 (Indicated): FDA-approved dose (P 125 mg or R 600 mg), or Arm 2 (Titrated): provider-choice lower starting dose (P 75 or 100 mg, or R 200 or 400 mg) with escalation to full dose as tolerated. All pts receive CDK4/6i (P or R) for 21 days in a 28-day cycle plus ET (aromatase inhibitor (AI) or fulvestrant (F)), agent selection is by physician choice. Subsequent dose reduction and discontinuation in both arms is per standard-of-care management. Main Eligibility Criteria Eligible pts are ≥65 years old with HR+/HER2- MBC, adequate organ function, and planned ET initiation in combination with first use of P or R in the metastatic setting. Specific Aims The primary aim is to compare time to discontinuation (TTD), on the indicated dosing arm vs. the titrated dosing arm. Secondary aims include evaluation of progression-free survival, overall survival, toxicity, dose intensity, quality of life (PROMIS-29 and FACT-G, AEs, health care utilization), and associations of baseline factors with outcomes. Statistical Methods Randomization is stratified by CDK4/6i (P vs. R), age (65-74 vs. >75 yrs), and ET (AI vs. F). The primary analysis will estimate the hazard ratio (HR) comparing TTD in the two arms using a stratified Cox proportional hazards model. The null hypothesis will be rejected if the 2-sided p-value for the HR is <0.05. A sample size of 500 was based on 80% power to detect a HR of 0.75. Present Accrual and Target Accrual As of July 7, 2025, 30 pts of 500 total pts have enrolled at 13 US clinical centers (80+ locations). Final analysis will occur either after 379 discontinuation events or 24 months after last enrollment. Conclusion The CDK Study will generate evidence to help oncologists and pts make decisions about the optimal dose and dosing strategy for CDK4/6is in older pts. Trial progress demonstrates the feasibility of trials evaluating alternative dosing strategies for FDA-approved anticancer regimens in older adults. Acknowledgements The authors thank Anne Loeser and Bridgette Hempstead, dedicated pt advocates, for their leadership in developing the CDK Study. The statements in this publication are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of PCORI, its Board of Governors or Methodology Committee. Contact Information For more information about the CDK Study (NCT06377852), please contact [email protected] or visit www.cdkstudy.org. Citation Format: A. Gregory, E. L. Mayer, D. Hershman, J. Cowden, R. D. Harvey, K. Kalinsky, A. Magnuson, P. Manohar, T. Pollastro, M. Sedrak, P. A. Spears, R. Thota, D. A. Walker, A. Boose, E. Garrett-Mayer, G. Grantham, D. Hinshaw, C. MacInnis, P. Mangat, J. Perez, J. Gralow. CDK4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) dosing knowledge (CDK) study: A pragmatic randomized trial of indicated vs. titrated CDK4/6i dosing in older adults with HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (MBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS5-07-08.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Cancer Research
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps5-07-08
Primary Topic
Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract PS5-07-08: CDK4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) dosing knowledge (CDK) study: A pragmatic randomized trial of indicated vs. titrated CDK4/6i dosing in older adults with HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (MBC)

Janice Cowden, Teri Pollastro, Mina S. Sedrak, Jacqueline K. Perez et al.
Clinical Cancer Research
Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
article

Abstract PS5-07-08: CDK4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) dosing knowledge (CDK) study: A pragmatic randomized trial of indicated vs. titrated CDK4/6i dosing in older adults with HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (MBC)

Janice Cowden, Teri Pollastro, Mina S. Sedrak, Jacqueline K. Perez, Ramya Thota, A. Boose, D. L. Hershman, J. Gralow, A. Magnuson, E. L. Mayer, P. A. Spears, P. Manohar, C. MacInnis, R. D. Harvey, P. Mangat, G. Grantham, A. Gregory, D. Hinshaw, D. A. Walker, K. M. Kalinsky, E. Garrett-Mayer
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Many cancer drugs have been FDA approved based on a drug development paradigm using a maximum tolerated dose (MTD) approach. For targeted anticancer agents, including CDK4/6is, the MTD approach is less relevant, as the optimal biological dose may be lower than the MTD. CDK4/6is are commonly combined with endocrine therapy (ET) for treatment (tx) of HR+/HER2- MBC. Clinical trials and real-world data show that CDK4/6is are commonly dose-reduced to manage side effects and improve tolerability, without loss of efficacy. Benefits of CDK4/6i therapy are similar in younger and older patients (pts); however, toxicity can be worse in older pts leading to more dose reductions, tx interruptions, and discontinuations. We hypothesize that titrated dosing (i.e., initiating tx at lower doses and escalating as tolerated) may enable older pts to remain on tx longer with fewer adverse events (AEs). The CDK Study (NCT06377852), a multicenter, pragmatic, randomized trial, was developed to determine if titrated dosing of palbociclib (P) or ribociclib (R) in pts aged ≥65 years with HR+/HER2- MBC would allow pts to stay on tx longer than the standard FDA-approved indicated dosing approach. This study is funded through a Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) Award (BPS-2022C3-26451). Trial Design For CDK4/6i dosing, pts are randomized 1:1 to: Arm 1 (Indicated): FDA-approved dose (P 125 mg or R 600 mg), or Arm 2 (Titrated): provider-choice lower starting dose (P 75 or 100 mg, or R 200 or 400 mg) with escalation to full dose as tolerated. All pts receive CDK4/6i (P or R) for 21 days in a 28-day cycle plus ET (aromatase inhibitor (AI) or fulvestrant (F)), agent selection is by physician choice. Subsequent dose reduction and discontinuation in both arms is per standard-of-care management. Main Eligibility Criteria Eligible pts are ≥65 years old with HR+/HER2- MBC, adequate organ function, and planned ET initiation in combination with first use of P or R in the metastatic setting. Specific Aims The primary aim is to compare time to discontinuation (TTD), on the indicated dosing arm vs. the titrated dosing arm. Secondary aims include evaluation of progression-free survival, overall survival, toxicity, dose intensity, quality of life (PROMIS-29 and FACT-G, AEs, health care utilization), and associations of baseline factors with outcomes. Statistical Methods Randomization is stratified by CDK4/6i (P vs. R), age (65-74 vs. >75 yrs), and ET (AI vs. F). The primary analysis will estimate the hazard ratio (HR) comparing TTD in the two arms using a stratified Cox proportional hazards model. The null hypothesis will be rejected if the 2-sided p-value for the HR is <0.05. A sample size of 500 was based on 80% power to detect a HR of 0.75. Present Accrual and Target Accrual As of July 7, 2025, 30 pts of 500 total pts have enrolled at 13 US clinical centers (80+ locations). Final analysis will occur either after 379 discontinuation events or 24 months after last enrollment. Conclusion The CDK Study will generate evidence to help oncologists and pts make decisions about the optimal dose and dosing strategy for CDK4/6is in older pts. Trial progress demonstrates the feasibility of trials evaluating alternative dosing strategies for FDA-approved anticancer regimens in older adults. Acknowledgements The authors thank Anne Loeser and Bridgette Hempstead, dedicated pt advocates, for their leadership in developing the CDK Study. The statements in this publication are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of PCORI, its Board of Governors or Methodology Committee. Contact Information For more information about the CDK Study (NCT06377852), please contact [email protected] or visit www.cdkstudy.org. Citation Format: A. Gregory, E. L. Mayer, D. Hershman, J. Cowden, R. D. Harvey, K. Kalinsky, A. Magnuson, P. Manohar, T. Pollastro, M. Sedrak, P. A. Spears, R. Thota, D. A. Walker, A. Boose, E. Garrett-Mayer, G. Grantham, D. Hinshaw, C. MacInnis, P. Mangat, J. Perez, J. Gralow. CDK4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) dosing knowledge (CDK) study: A pragmatic randomized trial of indicated vs. titrated CDK4/6i dosing in older adults with HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (MBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS5-07-08.

Clinical Cancer ResearchVol. 32(4_Supplement)
Intermountain Healthcare (US), Advocates for Youth (US), American Society of Clinical Oncology (US), Emory University (US), University of California, Los Angeles (US), Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US), Young Survival Coalition (US), University of Rochester Medical Center (US), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US), Mercer Island School District (US), Patient Advocate Foundation (US), Rush University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.