Abstract PS1-10-26: Comparative analysis of blood- and tissue-based <i>PIK3CA</i> mutation detection methods in the pivotal Phase 3 INAVO120 trial of palbociclib + fulvestrant ± inavolisib in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast c

Abstract BACKGROUND Detection of a PIK3CA mutation (PIK3CAmut) is a prerequisite for treatment with currently approved PI3K inhibitors in breast cancer (BC). However, this was only recently introduced in testing guidelines, and cross-assay concordance studies are limited. Using available blood and tissue specimens from participants (pts) screened for the Phase 3 INAVO120 trial (NCT04191499) of the recently approved PI3Kɑ inhibitor inavolisib, we compared the ability of various molecular tests to identify PIK3CAmut. METHODS Data from FoundationOne®Liquid CDx (F1LCDx®; Foundation Medicine, Inc.) profiling on circulating tumor (ct)DNA was available for 1422 pts, either from central screening for study eligibility (n = 1383) or post-enrollment testing of ctDNA from local blood / tumor tissue test eligible pts (n = 39). Due to data / sample sharing restrictions, 43 pts from China were excluded from an otherwise global population. Retrospective to enrollment, DNA extracted from available archival / fresh tumor tissue was assessed by FoundationOne®CDx (F1CDx®; n = 323) sequencing and / or the Cobas® PIK3CA Mutation Test (a polymerase chain reaction [PCR] test; n = 84). Depending on the sample data available, assay concordance was evaluated for samples from both enrolled and unenrolled individuals. For certain assay comparisons, the fraction of samples in which a PIK3CAmut was detected by both assays is reported; where otherwise appropriate, traditional positive (+), negative (-), and overall percent agreement (PPA, NPA, OPA) between assays are reported. RESULTS Of the 1383 individuals screened centrally with F1LCDx, 500 (36.2%) had an enrollment-eligible PIK3CAmut; 242 of these plus the 39 local test-identified pts (n = 281) were enrolled in the study and comprised the efficacy-evaluable population for this analysis. F1LCDx was performed on available ctDNA from 37 / 39 local test-identified pts; 27 / 37 samples (73.0%) had a PIK3CAmut identified by both assays. Of the ten discordances, most could be explained by low ctDNA tumor fraction (median 0.0% in discordant, 6.0% in remainder). F1CDx was performed on available tumor tissue from 29 local test-identified pts; a PIK3CAmut was identified in all 29 (100%). F1LCDx and F1CDx data were available for 315 pts (214 enrolled and treated, 101 screened but not enrolled / treated). For this F1LCDx vs F1CDx analysis, PPA ([F1LCDx+ and F1CDx+] / F1CDx+), NPA ([F1LCDx- and F1CDx-] / F1CDx-), and OPA ([F1LCDx+, F1CDx+, F1LCDx-, F1CDx-] / all data) were 93.0% (226 / 243), 73.6% (53 / 72), and 88.6% (279 / 315), respectively. Cobas PCR and F1CDx data were available for 84 pts (42 enrolled and treated, 42 screened but not enrolled / treated). PPA ([Cobas+ and F1CDx+] / F1CDx+), NPA ([Cobas- and F1CDx-] / F1CDx-), and OPA were 90.2% (46 / 51), 100% (33 / 33), and 94.0% (79 / 84), respectively. With regard to efficacy, pts enrolled by a local test (hazard ratio for progression-free survival [PFS] 0.7; 95% CI 0.3-1.5; n = 39) or the F1LCDx central test (hazard ratio for PFS 0.5; 95% CI 0.3-0.7; n = 242) showed a similar response to inavolisib plus palbociclib and fulvestrant over placebo plus palbociclib and fulvestrant. CONCLUSIONS This comprehensive concordance analysis utilizing INAVO120 specimens demonstrated the ability of both tissue- and blood-based PCR and next-generation sequencing assays to robustly identify a pt population with PIK3CA-mutated, hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced BC who may consistently benefit from this INAVO-based regimen. Citation Format: S. Hilz, K. Kalinsky, D. Juric, N. Turner, K. Jhaveri, S. Im, S. Loibl, S. Loi, C. Saura, P. Schmid, E. Shaddox, N. Pantoja Galicia, C. Guo, Y. Li, W. Darbonne, R. Desai, M. Pagan, P. Karavagul, J. Aimi, S. Royer-Joo, J. Schutzmann, T. Stout, C. Song, P. Bedard, K. Hutchinson. Comparative analysis of blood- and tissue-based PIK3CA mutation detection methods in the pivotal Phase 3 INAVO120 trial of palbociclib + fulvestrant ± inavolisib in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS1-10-26.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Cancer Research
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps1-10-26
Primary Topic
Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract PS1-10-26: Comparative analysis of blood- and tissue-based PIK3CA mutation detection methods in the pivotal Phase 3 INAVO120 trial of palbociclib + fulvestrant ± inavolisib in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast c

Junko Aimi, S. Royer-Joo, P. L. Bedard, R. Desai et al.
Clinical Cancer Research
Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
article

Abstract PS1-10-26: Comparative analysis of blood- and tissue-based PIK3CA mutation detection methods in the pivotal Phase 3 INAVO120 trial of palbociclib + fulvestrant ± inavolisib in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast c

Junko Aimi, S. Royer-Joo, P. L. Bedard, R. Desai, S. Loi, C. Song, S. Hilz, S. Loibl, K. E. Hutchinson, N. Pantoja Galicia, P. Karavagul, M. Pagan, J. Schutzmann, T. Stout, N. C. Turner, S. Im, E. Shaddox, C. Guo, W. Darbonne, D. Juric, K. M. Kalinsky, C. Saura, Y. Li, P. Schmid, K. L. Jhaveri
article en

Abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND Detection of a PIK3CA mutation (PIK3CAmut) is a prerequisite for treatment with currently approved PI3K inhibitors in breast cancer (BC). However, this was only recently introduced in testing guidelines, and cross-assay concordance studies are limited. Using available blood and tissue specimens from participants (pts) screened for the Phase 3 INAVO120 trial (NCT04191499) of the recently approved PI3Kɑ inhibitor inavolisib, we compared the ability of various molecular tests to identify PIK3CAmut. METHODS Data from FoundationOne®Liquid CDx (F1LCDx®; Foundation Medicine, Inc.) profiling on circulating tumor (ct)DNA was available for 1422 pts, either from central screening for study eligibility (n = 1383) or post-enrollment testing of ctDNA from local blood / tumor tissue test eligible pts (n = 39). Due to data / sample sharing restrictions, 43 pts from China were excluded from an otherwise global population. Retrospective to enrollment, DNA extracted from available archival / fresh tumor tissue was assessed by FoundationOne®CDx (F1CDx®; n = 323) sequencing and / or the Cobas® PIK3CA Mutation Test (a polymerase chain reaction [PCR] test; n = 84). Depending on the sample data available, assay concordance was evaluated for samples from both enrolled and unenrolled individuals. For certain assay comparisons, the fraction of samples in which a PIK3CAmut was detected by both assays is reported; where otherwise appropriate, traditional positive (+), negative (-), and overall percent agreement (PPA, NPA, OPA) between assays are reported. RESULTS Of the 1383 individuals screened centrally with F1LCDx, 500 (36.2%) had an enrollment-eligible PIK3CAmut; 242 of these plus the 39 local test-identified pts (n = 281) were enrolled in the study and comprised the efficacy-evaluable population for this analysis. F1LCDx was performed on available ctDNA from 37 / 39 local test-identified pts; 27 / 37 samples (73.0%) had a PIK3CAmut identified by both assays. Of the ten discordances, most could be explained by low ctDNA tumor fraction (median 0.0% in discordant, 6.0% in remainder). F1CDx was performed on available tumor tissue from 29 local test-identified pts; a PIK3CAmut was identified in all 29 (100%). F1LCDx and F1CDx data were available for 315 pts (214 enrolled and treated, 101 screened but not enrolled / treated). For this F1LCDx vs F1CDx analysis, PPA ([F1LCDx+ and F1CDx+] / F1CDx+), NPA ([F1LCDx- and F1CDx-] / F1CDx-), and OPA ([F1LCDx+, F1CDx+, F1LCDx-, F1CDx-] / all data) were 93.0% (226 / 243), 73.6% (53 / 72), and 88.6% (279 / 315), respectively. Cobas PCR and F1CDx data were available for 84 pts (42 enrolled and treated, 42 screened but not enrolled / treated). PPA ([Cobas+ and F1CDx+] / F1CDx+), NPA ([Cobas- and F1CDx-] / F1CDx-), and OPA were 90.2% (46 / 51), 100% (33 / 33), and 94.0% (79 / 84), respectively. With regard to efficacy, pts enrolled by a local test (hazard ratio for progression-free survival [PFS] 0.7; 95% CI 0.3-1.5; n = 39) or the F1LCDx central test (hazard ratio for PFS 0.5; 95% CI 0.3-0.7; n = 242) showed a similar response to inavolisib plus palbociclib and fulvestrant over placebo plus palbociclib and fulvestrant. CONCLUSIONS This comprehensive concordance analysis utilizing INAVO120 specimens demonstrated the ability of both tissue- and blood-based PCR and next-generation sequencing assays to robustly identify a pt population with PIK3CA-mutated, hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced BC who may consistently benefit from this INAVO-based regimen. Citation Format: S. Hilz, K. Kalinsky, D. Juric, N. Turner, K. Jhaveri, S. Im, S. Loibl, S. Loi, C. Saura, P. Schmid, E. Shaddox, N. Pantoja Galicia, C. Guo, Y. Li, W. Darbonne, R. Desai, M. Pagan, P. Karavagul, J. Aimi, S. Royer-Joo, J. Schutzmann, T. Stout, C. Song, P. Bedard, K. Hutchinson. Comparative analysis of blood- and tissue-based PIK3CA mutation detection methods in the pivotal Phase 3 INAVO120 trial of palbociclib + fulvestrant ± inavolisib in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS1-10-26.

Clinical Cancer ResearchVol. 32(4_Supplement)
Goethe University Frankfurt (DE), Roche (Switzerland) (CH), Hebron University (PS), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US), Emory University (US), Queen Mary University of London (GB), Cancer Research Institute (US), Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre (AU), New Generation University College (ET), Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (CA), Genesys (United States) (US), Cardiovascular Center Bethanien (DE), Gene Therapy Laboratory (FR), Royal Marsden Hospital (GB), Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari (ES), German Breast group (DE), Flometrics (United States) (US), Center for Cancer Research (US), Sunesis (United States) (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.