Robotic versus traditional laparoendoscopic single-site radical hysterectomy with no-manipulation technique: a retrospective cohort study

Robotic and traditional single-site radical hysterectomies with no-manipulation techniques are both feasible and safe for early-stage cervical cancer with comparable survival outcomes, though longer follow-up is needed to confirm non-inferiority. The robotic system could significantly reduce surgical difficulties and improve perioperative outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Oncology
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2026.1643025
Primary Topic
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Robotic versus traditional laparoendoscopic single-site radical hysterectomy with no-manipulation technique: a retrospective cohort study

Sijing Chen, Ying Zheng, Xia Yang, Yuehua Chen et al.
Frontiers in Oncology
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
article

Robotic versus traditional laparoendoscopic single-site radical hysterectomy with no-manipulation technique: a retrospective cohort study

Sijing Chen, Ying Zheng, Xia Yang, Yuehua Chen, Jianhong Liu, Lusi Deng, Qiao Wang, Fan Yang
article en

Abstract

Robotic and traditional single-site radical hysterectomies with no-manipulation techniques are both feasible and safe for early-stage cervical cancer with comparable survival outcomes, though longer follow-up is needed to confirm non-inferiority. The robotic system could significantly reduce surgical difficulties and improve perioperative outcomes.

Frontiers in OncologyVol. 16
Sichuan University (CN), West China Second University Hospital of Sichuan University (CN)
National Key Research and Development Program of China
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.