Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence in Product Design

This study explored how design students and practitioners perceive the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in product design, with a focus on perceived value and risk. Employing a mixed-methods approach, the research first used a structured survey and then conducted in-depth interviews. The study identified five key dimensions influencing perception: functional, emotional, social, economic, and security/copyright. Participants recognized AI’s functional benefits in improving efficiency, data analysis, ideation, and usability. Practitioners also emphasized the value of AI in visualization and anticipated the introduction of more advanced features. Emotionally, participants expressed ambivalence—welcoming AI’s potential to reshape creative roles, while voicing concerns about diminished creative competitiveness and job security. Social perceptions reflected the influence of organizational and educational cultures, with supportive environments fostering acceptance, while ongoing concerns about authorship and authenticity persisted. Economically, participants viewed AI as cost-effective, though they acknowledged the need to manage data security and copyright risks with proper safeguards. These findings underscore the importance of adaptive training programs and clear policy frameworks in facilitating the effective adoption of AI in product design. This study provides foundational and comprehensive insights into how stakeholders across academic and corporate settings perceive AI integration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The International Journal of Design Management and Professional Practice
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18848/2325-162x/cgp/a167
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence in Product Design

Yu Hyejin, Taeyoung Kwak, Seungkyun Hong, So Yeon Kim et al.
The International Journal of Design Management and Professional Practice
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence in Product Design

Yu Hyejin, Taeyoung Kwak, Seungkyun Hong, So Yeon Kim, Eric C Kim
article en

Abstract

This study explored how design students and practitioners perceive the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in product design, with a focus on perceived value and risk. Employing a mixed-methods approach, the research first used a structured survey and then conducted in-depth interviews. The study identified five key dimensions influencing perception: functional, emotional, social, economic, and security/copyright. Participants recognized AI’s functional benefits in improving efficiency, data analysis, ideation, and usability. Practitioners also emphasized the value of AI in visualization and anticipated the introduction of more advanced features. Emotionally, participants expressed ambivalence—welcoming AI’s potential to reshape creative roles, while voicing concerns about diminished creative competitiveness and job security. Social perceptions reflected the influence of organizational and educational cultures, with supportive environments fostering acceptance, while ongoing concerns about authorship and authenticity persisted. Economically, participants viewed AI as cost-effective, though they acknowledged the need to manage data security and copyright risks with proper safeguards. These findings underscore the importance of adaptive training programs and clear policy frameworks in facilitating the effective adoption of AI in product design. This study provides foundational and comprehensive insights into how stakeholders across academic and corporate settings perceive AI integration.

The International Journal of Design Management and Professional Practice
Yonsei University (KR)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.