Test–retest reliability of kicking performance assessments over a 2-day interval in elite youth soccer players

Results indicated good reliability for maximum ball speed (ICC = 0.87; LoA = [-2.1, 2.5] m/s), consistent with previous studies. Conversely, kicking accuracy demonstrated poor to moderate reliability (ICC = 0.00-0.66; LoA = [-0.46, 0.48] m). Stratified analyses revealed the highest accuracy ICC within the U15 group. Exploratory error ellipse analyses suggested potential utility in assessing kicking distribution, showing good reliability for ellipse angle (ICC = 0.80; LoA = [-0.98, 0.92] rad), though other parameters displayed low reliability. These findings highlight the strengths and limitations of soccer technical assessments. While maximum ball speed tests are highly reliable, kicking accuracy assessments remain problematic and require methodological refinement to improve reliability. Future research should incorporate advanced analytical techniques to enhance test reliability and consistency in elite athlete evaluations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PeerJ
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.20806
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Test–retest reliability of kicking performance assessments over a 2-day interval in elite youth soccer players

T. Andersen, Jeppe B. Carstensen
PeerJ
Sports Performance and Training
article

Test–retest reliability of kicking performance assessments over a 2-day interval in elite youth soccer players

T. Andersen, Jeppe B. Carstensen
article en

Abstract

Results indicated good reliability for maximum ball speed (ICC = 0.87; LoA = [-2.1, 2.5] m/s), consistent with previous studies. Conversely, kicking accuracy demonstrated poor to moderate reliability (ICC = 0.00-0.66; LoA = [-0.46, 0.48] m). Stratified analyses revealed the highest accuracy ICC within the U15 group. Exploratory error ellipse analyses suggested potential utility in assessing kicking distribution, showing good reliability for ellipse angle (ICC = 0.80; LoA = [-0.98, 0.92] rad), though other parameters displayed low reliability. These findings highlight the strengths and limitations of soccer technical assessments. While maximum ball speed tests are highly reliable, kicking accuracy assessments remain problematic and require methodological refinement to improve reliability. Future research should incorporate advanced analytical techniques to enhance test reliability and consistency in elite athlete evaluations.

PeerJVol. 14
Aarhus University (DK), Aarhus GeoSoftware (Denmark) (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.