Derogability By Collective Agreements In Germany And The Presumption

The promotion of derogability clauses, which allow collective agreements to deviate from statutory protection to the detriment of employees, has been an issue in the political debate on German labour law for some 20 years. While such derogability clauses can effectively allow for flexibility at the company or sectoral level, there are differing views on their suitability for promoting collective bargaining. This article highlights the paradox of such derogability clauses: They are legitimised by the presumption of fairness that underpins collective autonomy; at the same time, they create incentives for employers that challenge the very presumption of fairness. All in all, they are not only inappropriate but dangerous if their sole purpose is to promote employer commitment to collective bargaining.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.60082/2819-2567.1085
Primary Topic
Discrimination and Equality Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Derogability By Collective Agreements In Germany And The Presumption

Eva Kocher
Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal
Discrimination and Equality Law
article

Derogability By Collective Agreements In Germany And The Presumption

Eva Kocher
article en

Abstract

The promotion of derogability clauses, which allow collective agreements to deviate from statutory protection to the detriment of employees, has been an issue in the political debate on German labour law for some 20 years. While such derogability clauses can effectively allow for flexibility at the company or sectoral level, there are differing views on their suitability for promoting collective bargaining. This article highlights the paradox of such derogability clauses: They are legitimised by the presumption of fairness that underpins collective autonomy; at the same time, they create incentives for employers that challenge the very presumption of fairness. All in all, they are not only inappropriate but dangerous if their sole purpose is to promote employer commitment to collective bargaining.

Comparative Labor Law & Policy JournalVol. 45(4)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Discrimination and Equality Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.