Deriving wisdom from data: The value and continued rationale for structured data in the era of artificial intelligence–driven oncology care

The adoption of electronic health records (EHRs) has transformed health care, improving efficiency and chart accessibility. However, the widespread reliance on unstructured data entry and the lack of standardized documentation frameworks have resulted in significant data fragmentation across health care systems. The prevalence of unstructured data in EHRs limits their potential for clinical decision support, trial matching, real-world evidence (RWE) generation, and quality measurement. Data fragmentation in health care triggers a cascade of challenges that ultimately compromise patient care. Clinicians face an excessive documentation burden and struggle to locate critical information buried in unstructured notes. Researchers encounter difficulties in extracting reliable clinical data. EHR vendors grapple with standardizing unstructured information for interoperability, and payers are unable to process unstructured clinical data efficiently to support value-based care models. These challenges are particularly acute in oncology, where complex clinical elements like cancer staging, disease status, and treatment changes require precise, structured documentation. Emerging artificial intelligence (AI) technologies, such as large language models (LLMs) and ambient listening, offer a path to automate structured data generation while reducing the workload on providers. Here, the authors propose LLM-based workflows that balance automation with clinician verification, streamlining data entry without compromising accuracy. Realizing these benefits requires coordinated efforts among clinicians, researchers, EHR vendors, payers, and policymakers to align regulatory frameworks with AI-driven innovations. This article outlines a strategy to enhance structured data capture within EHRs, ultimately improving patient care, research, and health care efficiency.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer
Published
2026-02-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.70307
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deriving wisdom from data: The value and continued rationale for structured data in the era of artificial intelligence–driven oncology care

Penelope Fu, Robert C. Stillman, David Liebovitz, Neil J. Shah et al.
Cancer
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Deriving wisdom from data: The value and continued rationale for structured data in the era of artificial intelligence–driven oncology care

Penelope Fu, Robert C. Stillman, David Liebovitz, Neil J. Shah, Tricia Heinrichs, Robert R. Freimuth, Lauren B. Bruckner, Robert T Stapp, Daniel B. Martin, Irbaz Riaz, Waddah Arafat, Hamid Emamekhoo, Peter E. Gabriel, Amye J. Tevaarwerk, Randa M. Perkins, Jessica Sugalski
article en

Abstract

The adoption of electronic health records (EHRs) has transformed health care, improving efficiency and chart accessibility. However, the widespread reliance on unstructured data entry and the lack of standardized documentation frameworks have resulted in significant data fragmentation across health care systems. The prevalence of unstructured data in EHRs limits their potential for clinical decision support, trial matching, real-world evidence (RWE) generation, and quality measurement. Data fragmentation in health care triggers a cascade of challenges that ultimately compromise patient care. Clinicians face an excessive documentation burden and struggle to locate critical information buried in unstructured notes. Researchers encounter difficulties in extracting reliable clinical data. EHR vendors grapple with standardizing unstructured information for interoperability, and payers are unable to process unstructured clinical data efficiently to support value-based care models. These challenges are particularly acute in oncology, where complex clinical elements like cancer staging, disease status, and treatment changes require precise, structured documentation. Emerging artificial intelligence (AI) technologies, such as large language models (LLMs) and ambient listening, offer a path to automate structured data generation while reducing the workload on providers. Here, the authors propose LLM-based workflows that balance automation with clinician verification, streamlining data entry without compromising accuracy. Realizing these benefits requires coordinated efforts among clinicians, researchers, EHR vendors, payers, and policymakers to align regulatory frameworks with AI-driven innovations. This article outlines a strategy to enhance structured data capture within EHRs, ultimately improving patient care, research, and health care efficiency.

CancerVol. 132(4)
ECRI Institute (US), Northwestern University (US), Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center (US), City Of Hope National Medical Center (US), Mayo Clinic (US), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US), The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center – Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute (US), Moffitt Cancer Center (US), Fred Hutch Cancer Center (US), Southwestern Medical Center (US), University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center (US), Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US), Mayo Clinic Hospital (US), Mayo Clinic in Florida (US), University of Pennsylvania (US), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.